SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : The Justa & Lars Honors Bob Brinker Investment Club -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Herbert W. Landon who wrote (7141)7/25/1999 8:55:00 AM
From: Boca_PETE  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 15132
 
Mr. Landon: re:< warning us about high PE's while maintaining a bullish position.>

You failed to mention that unlike two years ago, Brinker is also warning about further FED rate hikes coming in reaction to an overheating U.S. economy as a result of:

(1) Increased exports due to increased demand from the synchronous recovery of the depressed economies of Japan, Far East and Latin America.

(2) FED slowing of growth in the money supply reflected in the 3-month and 6-month growth in M2 and M3.

(3) The tightness in the labor market reflected by recent low reported unemployment rates and the shortage of skilled labor which could lead to inflationary wage hikes as employers bid for scarce available workers.

(4) The high level of investor complacency reflected in the large number of people quitting their day jobs to become day traders, the stubbornly high 65%-70% Bullish sentiment of investment advisors as a percent of bulls plus bears, the low Put-Call Ratio (.40 to .55) in recent months, and the low level of liquid assets held be mutual funds (4.7%).

(5) That fact that P/E's have risen to record heights during a period when Long Bond interest rates have risen from 4.75% to approximately 6%. During Spring-Summer 1987, interest rates rose in tandem with the parabolic rise in the DOW. Although the S&P was up 5.5% that year, those who bought in the July-August period got creamed during the so called "crash of 87".

Picking single things Brinker says out of context does not support your view in my opinion.

P



To: Herbert W. Landon who wrote (7141)7/25/1999 9:20:00 AM
From: mister topes  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 15132
 
He can go wrong very easily. He is recommended a l00% invested
position pending further developments in his long term timing
model. If the market collapses from here he will turn out to
be wrong. What could be more obvious. He is putting his
record on the line by continuing to stay fully invested while
he discusses possible future developments he is watching.
Why does he bother to tell people what he is thinking about
possible future market developments?
Instead, he should just talk about refinancing mortgages and
setting up a Roth I.R.A. and not even discuss the market.
This way, he and only he would have the benefits of the timing
model's components and trends. All others would be uninformed
of any possible future changes or developments. And then they
could not complain about every comment that is made.



To: Herbert W. Landon who wrote (7141)7/25/1999 11:35:00 AM
From: Digger Sacket  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 15132
 
I agree. The bottom line is his advice to stay 100% invested. To paraphrase our guru: "It's what the Fed does, not what they say."
It is insightful that even with record high valuations, P/E's, complacency etc he has to chosen to remain 100% invested.
That's the bottom line. If the market tanks while being 100% invested, "bragging" about ignoring the warning signs will sound pretty hollow.

Digger