SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Thermo Tech Technologies (TTRIF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Zeev Hed who wrote (5706)7/25/1999 1:04:00 PM
From: CAYMAN  Respond to of 6467
 
REGARDING A PROXY TAKE-OVER!

By: ReformIsAlive

YAHOO Post #1671

From Kim to Peterluke:

I think you are correct in that the timing is most appropriate with the BC injunction prohibiting TT from issuing more shares. Regarding a proxy takeover, at least we will not be trying to "hit a moving target". My latest count is about 70M shares but some of those may have sold their holdings. I think that with rumors of resignations and takeovers, prudence requires allowing others another week to work things out.
Following is my belief and assessment. Our fearless (hapless) leader does not want to sign out. Past liabilities loom large in his mind. He is in the proverbial situation of trying to decide whether he wants his arm or leg cut off (paying now or later). This puts his mind in saturation, too many synapses firing at once (three). During the more lucid moments he decides that resigning forthwith and limiting his liability might be best; at other moments he thinks he might be able to put it off and give him time to delay. I just hope the insurance company does not give him the money directly but payment is issued after repairs are finished.
Incidentally, I heard that the BC halt to trading was inspired by malfeasance in the transfer station when Branconnier and Ambrose were lining their pockets with $30K per month. This has a ring of truth to it where it may explain the Q2 $750,000 increase in trucking costs.

Peter call me.

Kim

odcom@earthlink.net

Posted: 07/25/1999 10:29 am EDT as a reply to: Msg 1659 by Peterluke_99

***********************************************************************

KIM, THE TRUCKING SCAM IS NOTHING NEW.

By: Peterluke_99

YAHOO Post #1673

However, I would be careful in implicating Mr. Ambrose.

I heard some other things regarding this. It may be more
interesting to see what Mr. Ambrose billed Thermo for
services rendered first. Companies were supposed to be
paying Thermo a tipping fee to drop off their garbage.
Now it seems Thermo PAID to have raw product brought in
to give the appearance of operating at a certain scale.

There is another interesting fact regarding the de-packing
plant. I guess they had many tons of aluminum cans left
over, and instead of selling the aluminum for scrap, say
about 45 cents a pound, they actually paid someone to come
and take it away. Pocket change for someone?

Cheers,

Aardvark

Posted: 07/25/1999 10:50 am EDT as a reply to: Msg 1671 by ReformIsAlive







To: Zeev Hed who wrote (5706)7/25/1999 6:02:00 PM
From: CAYMAN  Respond to of 6467
 
Trucking scam is not new, I agree . . .

by: ReformIsAlive

YAHOO Post #1678

but it was only offered as the explanation of why the BC version of the SEC acted to halt trading. I also do not know that any of the parties acted as described, only that the information was relayed to me and that it had some "wring of truth" in that it would explain the $750K Q2 increase in trucking costs.

Kim

odcom@earthlink.net

Posted: 07/25/1999 04:37 pm EDT as a reply to:
Msg 1673 by Peterluke_99



To: Zeev Hed who wrote (5706)7/25/1999 6:41:00 PM
From: CAYMAN  Respond to of 6467
 
OK, SO NOW FORM A POOL OF MONEY!

By: Peterluke_99

YAHOO Post #1684

Someone open up a trust account. Any shareholder pledged to
changing management can contribute say $1.00 per 1,000 shares
owned. If 80 million shares are pledged, then you have a nice
pot of about 80K. That's power. All funds can be returned
via check if not needed, or pro-rated on the balance left.

Be smart. Don't pledge on the net. Get your e-mails working
for the common good.

The key now is to gather evidence, not hear-say bull. Those
who have evidence can sign a sworn statement. It would not
take many to get a judge to hear grievances brought by
shareholders.

Think about it. You can bet some will sit up and take notice
very very quickly.

Cheers,

Aardvark

Posted: 07/25/1999 05:42 PM EDT as a reply to:
Msg 1682 by cayman_98



To: Zeev Hed who wrote (5706)7/25/1999 7:31:00 PM
From: CAYMAN  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 6467
 
Excerpts from:

Canada Business Corporations Act (CBCA) -- CHAPTER C-44

DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS

PART IX

RECEIVERS AND RECEIVER-MANAGERS

Functions of receiver

94. A receiver of any property of a corporation may, subject to the rights of secured creditors, receive the income from the property and pay the liabilities connected with the property and realize the security interest of those on behalf of whom he is appointed, but, except to the extent permitted by a court, he may
not carry on the business of the corporation.

1974-75-76, c. 33, s. 89.

Functions of receiver-manager

95. A receiver of a corporation may, if he is also appointed receiver-manager of the corporation, carry on any business of the corporation to protect the security interest of those on behalf of whom he is appointed.

1974-75-76, c. 33, s. 90.

DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS

Power To Manage:

102. (1) Subject to any unanimous shareholder agreement, the directors shall manage the business and affairs of a corporation.

Number of directors

(2) A corporation shall have one or more directors but a corporation, any of the issued securities of which are or were part of a distribution to the public and remain outstanding and are held by more than one person, shall have not fewer than three directors, at least two of whom are not officers or
employees of the corporation or its affiliates.

1974-75-76, c. 33, s. 97; 1978-79, c. 9, s. 26.

By-laws

103. (1) Unless the articles, by-laws or a unanimous shareholder agreement otherwise provide, the directors may, by resolution, make, amend or repeal any by-laws that regulate the business or affairs of the corporation.

Shareholder approval

(2) The directors shall submit a by-law, or an amendment or a repeal of a by-law, made under subsection (1) to the shareholders at the next meeting of shareholders, and the shareholders may, by ordinary resolution, confirm, reject or amend the by-law, amendment or repeal.

Effective date

(3) A by-law, or an amendment or a repeal of a by-law, is effective from the date of the resolution of the directors under subsection (1) until it is confirmed, confirmed as amended or rejected by the shareholders under subsection (2) or until it ceases to be effective under subsection (4) and, where the by-law is confirmed or confirmed as amended, it continues in effect in the form in which it was so confirmed.

Idem

(4) If a by-law, an amendment or a repeal is rejected by the shareholders, or if the directors do not submit a by-law, an amendment or a repeal to the shareholders as required under subsection (2), the by-law, amendment or repeal ceases to be effective and no subsequent resolution of the directors to make,
amend or repeal a by-law having substantially the same purpose or effect is effective until it is confirmed or confirmed as amended by the shareholders.

Shareholder proposal

(5) A shareholder entitled to vote at an annual meeting of shareholders may, in accordance with section 137, make a proposal to make, amend or repeal a by-law.

1974-75-76, c. 33, s. 98; 1978-79, c. 9, s. 27.

Organization meeting

104. (1) After issue of the certificate of incorporation, a meeting of the directors of the corporation shall be held at which the directors may

(a) make by-laws;

(b) adopt forms of security certificates and corporate records;

(c) authorize the issue of securities;(d) appoint officers;

(e) appoint an auditor to hold office until the first annual meeting of shareholders;

(f) make banking arrangements; and (g) transact any other business.

Exception

(2) Subsection (1) does not apply to a body corporate to which a certificate of amalgamation has been issued under subsection 185(4) or to which a certificate of continuance has been issued under subsection 187(4).

Calling meeting

(3) An incorporator or a director may call the meeting of directors referred to in subsection (1) by giving not less than five days notice thereof by mail to each director, stating the time and place of the meeting.

1974-75-76, c. 33, s. 99; 1978-79, c. 9, s. 28.

Qualifications Of Directors:

105. (1) The following persons are disqualified from being a director of a corporation:

(a) Anyone who is less than eighteen years of age;

(b) Anyone who is of unsound mind and has been so found by a court in Canada or elsewhere;

(c) A person who is not an individual; or

(d) A person who has the status of bankrupt.

Notice of meeting

135. (1) Notice of the time and place of a meeting of shareholders shall be sent not less than twenty-one days nor more than fifty days before the meeting,

(a) to each shareholder entitled to vote at the meeting;

(b) to each director; and

(c) to the auditor of the corporation.

Exception

(2) A notice of a meeting is not required to be sent to shareholders who were not registered on the records of the corporation or its transfer agent on the record date determined under subsection 134(2) or (3), but failure to receive a notice does not deprive a shareholder of the right to vote at the meeting.

Adjournment

(3) If a meeting of shareholders is adjourned for less than thirty days it is not necessary, unless the by-laws otherwise provide, to give notice of the adjourned meeting, other than by announcement at the earliest meeting that is adjourned.

Notice of adjourned meeting

(4) If a meeting of shareholders is adjourned by one or more adjournments for an aggregate of thirty days or more, notice of the adjourned meeting shall be given as for an original meeting but, unless the meeting is adjourned by one or more adjournments for an aggregate of more than ninety days, subsection 149(1) does not apply.

Business

(5) All business transacted at a special meeting of shareholders and all business transacted at an annual meeting of shareholders, except consideration of the financial statements, auditor's report, election of directors and re-appointment of the incumbent auditor, is deemed to be special business.

Notice of business

(6) Notice of a meeting of shareholders at which special business is to be transacted shall state

(a) the nature of that business in sufficient detail to permit the shareholder to form a reasoned judgment thereon; and

(b) the text of any special resolution to be submitted to the meeting.

1974-75-76, c. 33, s. 129.

Requisition Of Meeting

143. (1) The holders of not less than five per cent of the issued shares of a corporation that carry the right to vote at a meeting sought to be held may requisition the directors to call a meeting of shareholders for the purposes stated in the requisition.

Form

(2) The requisition referred to in subsection (1), which may consist of several documents of like form each signed by one or more shareholders, shall state the business to be transacted at the meeting and shall be sent to each director and to the registered office of the corporation.

Directors calling meeting

(3) On receiving the requisition referred to in subsection (1), the directors shall call a meeting of shareholders to transact the business stated in the requisition, unless

(a) a record date has been fixed under subsection 134(2) and notice thereof has been given under subsection 134(4);

(b) the directors have called a meeting of shareholders and have given notice thereof under section 135; or

(c) the business of the meeting as stated in the requisition includes matters described in paragraphs 137(5)(b) to (e).

Shareholder calling meeting

(4) If the directors do not within twenty-one days after receiving the requisition referred to in subsection (1) call a meeting, any shareholder who signed the requisition may call the meeting.

Procedure

(5) A meeting called under this section shall be called as nearly as possible in the manner in which meetings are to be called pursuant to the by-laws, this Part and Part XIII.

Reimbursement

(6) Unless the shareholders otherwise resolve at a meeting called under subsection (4), the corporation shall reimburse the shareholders the expenses reasonably incurred by them in requisitioning, calling and holding the meeting.

1974-75-76, c. 33, s. 137.

Meeting Called By Court

144. (1) If for any reason it is impracticable to call a meeting of shareholders of a corporation in the manner in which meetings of those shareholders may be called, or to conduct the meeting in the manner prescribed by the by-laws and this Act, or if for any other reason a court thinks fit, the court, on the application of a director, a shareholder entitled to vote at the meeting or the Director, may order a meeting to be called, held and conducted in such manner as the court directs.

Varying quorum

(2) Without restricting the generality of subsection (1), the court may order that the quorum required by the by-laws or this Act be varied or dispensed with at a meeting called, held and conducted pursuant to this section.

Valid meeting

(3) A meeting called, held and conducted pursuant to this section is for all purposes a meeting of shareholders of the corporation duly called, held and conducted.

1974-75-76, c. 33, s. 138.

Court review of election

145. (1) A corporation or a shareholder or director may apply to a court to determine any controversy with respect to an election or appointment of a director or auditor of the corporation.

Powers of court

(2) On an application under this section, the court may make any order it thinks fit including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing,

(a) an order restraining a director or auditor whose election or appointment is challenged from acting pending determination of the dispute;

(b) an order declaring the result of the disputed election or appointment;

(c) an order requiring a new election or appointment, and including in the order directions for the management of the business and affairs of the corporation until a new election is held or appointment made; and

(d) an order determining the voting rights of shareholders and of persons claiming to own shares.

1974-75-76, c. 33, s. 139.

Mandatory Solicitation

149. (1) Subject to subsection (2), the management of a corporation shall, concurrently with giving notice of a meeting of shareholders, send a form of proxy in prescribed form to each shareholder who is entitled to receive notice of the meeting.

Exception

(2) Where a corporation has fewer than fifteen shareholders, two or more joint holders being counted as one shareholder, the management of the corporation is not required to send a form of proxy under subsection (1).

Offence

(3) If the management of a corporation fails to comply, without reasonable cause, with subsection (1), the corporation is guilty of an offence and liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding five thousand dollars.

Officers, etc., of corporations

(4) Where a corporation commits an offence under subsection (3), any director or officer of the corporation who knowingly authorized, permitted or acquiesced in the commission of the offence is a party to and guilty of the offence and is
liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding five thousand dollars or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months or to both, whether or not the corporation has been prosecuted or convicted.

1974-75-76, c. 33, s. 143.



To: Zeev Hed who wrote (5706)7/27/1999 11:37:00 PM
From: CAYMAN  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6467
 
AGM Article

FYI: Here is a (back issue) editorial from the Richmond Review Newspaper.

Please note paragraph stating Thermo Tech has 80 clients?!

Who are they? Where are they?

Regards,

cayman_98

Web-site:

rpl.richmond.bc.ca

Internet Edition
Vol. 5 No. 21
Wednesday,
May 26, 1999

WASTE NOT, WANT NOT

Mitchell Island Plant Turns Food Waste Into Cash

Philip Raphael, Contributor

It may not be quite like changing water into wine, but the results are
almost as miraculous.

Common household food waste — usually fodder for the kitchen garburetor — along with commercially produced foodstuffs that have been damaged or reached expiration dates and were destined for landfills is now being transformed into animal feed with a little "divine intervention" of the scientific kind.

Performing this feat of near biblical proportions is Thermo Tech
Technologies Inc. which opened its latest recycling plant, Richmond Bio Conversion, on Mitchell Island on May 21.

"The world is literally drowning in waste. We are offering a solution that can help reduce how much is being sent to our landfills and turn it into a valuable product," said René Branconnier, president and CEO of Thermo Tech Technologies, a Langley-based company that is traded on NASDAQ. "It's almost unbelievable what we can do here. This a home grown process that was developed at UBC and could possibly lead to a worldwide market for our technology."

It has taken the company 20 years to refine the process which uses raw
materials that arrive by truck load in three forms: liquid, bulk and
packaged. Each shipment is weighed before being unloaded. Businesses pay a $45 per ton tipping fee to dump their waste organic material at the plant.

The cardboard or paper covering on packaged material is stripped away and sent for recycling — nothing is wasted.

The organic material, which can range from brewery and winery wastes to bakery goods and dairy products, is then dumped in huge kitchen blender-type machines called pulpers to break down the solids into a finer mixture or slurry. That is sent by pipeline to a fermenting tank where pasteurization and bacterial growth take place over a 24-hour period.

The bacteria create high temperatures while digesting the slurry and
ultimately a single cell protein is created.

That mixture is then dried and converted into livestock food pellets which are safe for cows, pigs and chickens to eat.

"Our product is a high value food source that is no different than regular livestock feed which is made from various grain or Soya bean crops," said Bill Bell, a consultant working for Thermo Tech Technologies who has spent 30 years in the livestock food industry. "And since it's a high-heat process there's no danger that the food source can be contaminated and cause problems like Mad Cow disease."

Based on processing a maximum of 1,200 tons of raw organic material a day, Thermo Tech's conversion process yields about a third (235 tons) of livestock feed for which the company receives approximately $200 a ton. Currently, the plant is running at 50 per cent capacity.

And no waste is left at the end of the process, except for plant odours that are burned off before air is vented from the building.

A staff of 20 has been running the $28 million plant on a 24-hour,
seven-day-a-week basis since operations began last December.

So far, the company has around 80 clients. They include supermarket chains and well known bulk producers such as Sun-Rype and Coca-Cola.

This is the third plant Thermo Tech has built, the first was opened in New York and Toronto has two. Mitchell Island was chosen because of its convenient location to suppliers and end product markets.

"We are close to the downtown markets for raw materials and right near the access to the highways to transport the finished product," Branconnier said.

One city councilor who is extremely pleased with Thermo Tech's opening is Harold Steves.

"About 20 years ago I worked hard at getting them funding to locate a pilot project here. Unfortunately that didn't work out and they had to go elsewhere, but it's gratifying that they have come back and located in Richmond."

Steves, who earned a degree in agricultural engineering at UBC, said that as a university student he performed similar lab experiments that used the fundamentals of Thermo Tech's conversion process, "But only more in low-tech methods."

Recycling waste products is important in all communities, Steves said, but even more so in Richmond.

"Richmond is an island. And anything we do in terms of dumping garbage up the river or pumping sewage out to sea is going to come back to haunt us," he said. "So, it's significant that a plant which can handle waste products in the manner and volumes this one can has decided to locate here. It's more than just a feather in the city's cap."

It could lead to like-minded businesses also putting down roots in the area, he added.

"I think Richmond should become one of the high-tech environmental areas in the world and having this plant here is a big step in that direction."

Exporting the technology is on the forefront of Branconnier's mind and
points to markets in the U.S. and Asia as likely areas of expansion.

"When you look at the potential we have here to reduce landfill use it can be staggering. Add that to the fact the technology can be easily converted to transform waste water to fertilizer, and we can make a great impact," he said.