SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Father Terrence who wrote (47118)7/25/1999 5:03:00 PM
From: Grainne  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 108807
 
The fact that there may be more oil buried beneath the earth does not mean that it is advisable to actually dig it out and burn it. Of course, being a rape-the-earth proponent, if it is there and it can increase your wealth or create convenience, you will use it.



To: Father Terrence who wrote (47118)7/25/1999 7:00:00 PM
From: Krowbar  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 108807
 
I was not talking about playing it safe by worrying about running out of fossil fuels, I was was referring to the fact that pouring more and more CO2 into the atmosphere may not be safer than the risks associated with using nuclear power.

500 years more of burning oil products? How much more CO2 into the atmosphere does that represent?

Del


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News