Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jacques Chitte who wrote (47234)	7/26/1999 1:17:00 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 108807

The Smithsonian is generally rated the top by folks knowledgeable on the subject. The National Gallery, which is not part of the Smithsonian, but is on the Mall, is competitive in the quality of its collection with some of the others (such as the Louvre and Hermitage), but not in the extensity of it. My only real experience is with New York. The Metropolitan Museum of Art is superior to the National Gallery in its antiquities and oriental art, but the National Gallery is superior in the quality of its painting collection, with the possible exception of the the Impressionists and post- Impressionists. The Museum of Modern Art is superior to the Hirschorn, and more complete than the collection in the modern section of the National Gallery. The Guggenheim permanent collection is inferior to the NG, about the same quality as the Hirschorn, and arguably inferior to the Phillips. Not only does the Phillips, which is off of the Mall, supplement the modern art in the city, but there is oriental art is found at the Sackler and the Freer, and there are several other art museums (the National Museum of American Art, the Corcoran, and others) that fill out aspects of the subject. Overall, I would say that New York has a slight edge in art, and Washington has the edge in other kinds of museums. My impression is that the only city that may beat Washington by a mile art- wise is Paris, and even then I have heard that the Smithsonian is superior in other areas...

To: Jacques Chitte who wrote (47234)	7/26/1999 1:49:00 PM
From: jbe	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 108807

Lather, Neocon DID say "greatest museum COMPLEX in the world." I'm with him if he really means "greatest free, state-supported COMPLEX of interconnected museums." There are some excellent private museums in Washington -- the Corcoran, for example, and the Phillips. But it is that huge complex of free museums grouped around the Mall, exhibiting everything from space technology to African art, that makes Washington such a standout. St. Petersburg, for example, can't compare. The Hermitage, of course, is one of the world's greatest museums. But there is hardly any post-Impressionist modern art or non-European art there, or in any other museum in the city. Furthermore, state funding has dried up almost entirely, and the consequences, for existing collections, have been disastrous. Joan