Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rudedog who wrote (137686)	7/26/1999 3:40:00 PM
From: arthur pritchard	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 176387

VITAMIN B6 (aka PYRIDOXINE)SOURCES.....fish, whole wheat bread,soybeans,avocados,peanuts,walnuts fresh fruits(particularly bananas),Vegetables and wheat germ. IN SOME INSTANCES,CAN ALLEVIATE CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDRONE PROBLEMS. Garrett Symbol Money Flow Net Chg. % Net Chg. Last EMC 88,525,448 -1.52 -15/16 60 13/16 T 87,478,328 +1.62 +7/8 54 7/8 DIS 83,631,841 +2.56 +11/16 27 1/2 INTC 52,191,543 -1.75 -1 1/8 63 1/16 GE 37,479,594 -1.03 -1 3/16 114 KO 36,599,802 +1.31 +13/16 63 1/16 IBM 32,234,474 -1.10 -1 3/8 123 7/16 HWP 31,567,938 -1.51 -1 5/8 106 1/8 WMT 23,007,701 +1.39 +5/8 45 9/16 GTW 20,016,810 -3.17 -2 5/16 70 11/16 PG 18,104,136 -1.13 -1 87 1/4 CPQ 15,475,920 +1.28 +5/16 24 13/16 DELL 15,293,326 -2.29 -15/16 40 1/16 MRK 13,880,392 -.91 -5/8 68 3/8 CBS 11,310,823 -.14 -1/16 44 9/16 AMZN 11,101,519 -7.47 -8 9/16 106 PCS 11,087,174 -.44 -1/4 56 7/8 QCOM 10,683,284 -1.09 -1 11/16 153 SCH 8,688,839 -2.14 -1 45 3/4 FDX 8,599,078 -2.36 -1 1/16 43 15/16 GM 8,297,559 +.38 +1/4 65 7/8 TQNT 2,901,283 -1.41 -5/8 43 5/8 CNF 2,643,231 +2.59 +1 1/16 42 1/16 POS 2,119,645 -2.92 -2 7/8 95 5/8 CHV 2,101,408 -1.60 -1 1/2 92 5/16 LOR 1,466,392 -.32 -1/16 19 3/4 MSGI 1,120,864 +4.82 +1 1/16 23 1/8 AA 827,788 -1.58 -15/16 58 9/16 ZSUN 707,333 +.28 +.03120 11.09370 MO 567,812 +.33 +1/8 38 1/4 WIND 394,281 -.42 -1/16 14 11/16 IINT 221,232 +4.11 +3/16 4 3/4 BWEB 216,838 -8.94 -2 5/8 26 3/4 IIXL 127,680 -6.67 -1 15/16 27 1/8 ADBE 111,771 -.72 -5/8 86 USPL 60,386 +.72 +1/16 8 3/4 VISX 37,344 -2.33 -2 3/8 99 3/8 IMOT 18,378 +.64 +.03130 4.93750 DDEQ 11,517 -4.17 -.12500 2.87500 MCNS -16,934 -3.43 -3/8 10 9/16 NETD -55,906 -9.43 -.46870 4.50000 XNET -64,350 -7.23 -.18750 2.40620 MMM -238,357 -.91 -13/16 88 11/16 NETP -263,777 -8.84 -1 5/8 16 3/4 EPAY -321,814 -4.85 -2 1/16 40 1/2 SPYG -520,686 -5.22 -13/16 14 3/4 NETS -534,197 -10.20 -2 13/16 24 3/4 RMBS -611,674 -5.29 -5 1/4 93 15/16 EELN -865,814 -10.19 -5 1/2 48 1/2 NTAP -1,107,812 -6.13 -3 7/16 52 5/8 ZDZ -1,169,260 -8.72 -1 7/8 19 5/8 PCNTF -1,398,368 -6.92 -2 3/4 37 ALD -1,484,022 -1.65 -1 1/16 63 1/4 RTRSY -2,153,611 -1.71 -1 3/8 79 RNWK -2,412,187 -7.08 -6 3/8 83 5/8 DCLK -2,685,151 -5.38 -4 1/2 79 3/16 AWRE -3,811,148 -6.38 -3 3/16 46 13/16 AAPL -4,128,456 -3.87 -2 1/16 51 1/4 GSTRF -4,697,105 -6.25 -1 15/16 29 1/16 LCOS -4,700,195 -6.52 -6 3/16 88 3/4 EK -5,446,487 -1.69 -1 3/16 69 1/4 ATHM -6,560,470 -1.36 -5/8 45 7/16 GNET -7,502,532 -11.14 -7 7/8 62 13/16 CDN -9,880,798 -1.74 -3/16 10 9/16 WCOM -10,754,564 -1.57 -1 3/8 86 3/16 NOK -11,461,964 -1.91 -1 11/16 86 7/8 EGRP -11,898,524 -4.69 -1 1/2 30 1/2 TWE -13,269,646 -13.65 -2 7/8 18 3/16 NOVL -16,731,821 -5.61 -1 1/2 25 1/4 BRCM -22,968,145 -8.12 -10 1/8 114 1/2 NITE -24,906,103 -9.04 -4 13/32 44 5/16 ORCL -33,442,506 -3.63 -1 5/16 34 7/8 CMGI -34,568,747 -7.91 -7 11/16 89 1/2 SUNW -41,775,721 -3.20 -2 1/4 68 1/8 CSCO -56,796,707 -2.88 -1 13/16 61 1/8 YHOO -66,553,429 -8.58 -12 1/2 133 1/4 QQQ -87,116,572 -2.07 -2 3/8 112 3/16 MSFT -101,468,895 -2.29 -2 1/16 88 3/16 LU -127,533,281 -4.00 -2 11/16 64 7/16 AOL -259,876,391 -7.64 -8 1/4 99 11/16

To: rudedog who wrote (137686)	7/26/1999 4:31:00 PM
From: GRANOLA	Respond to of 176387

thread, does anyone have experience with DirecPC...i am interested in your opinions, especially re: reliability...thanks, GRANOLA

To: rudedog who wrote (137686)	7/27/1999 12:51:00 AM
From: jim kelley	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 176387

I guess the findings depend on who is paying for the study. IT managers love the centralized server version of computing because the control of the computing environment comes into their realm. It gives them power over the user. Thin clients are easier to sell to IT departments because they promise bigger IT budgets and administrative staffs. This centralized control is appropriate in companies that require strict "floor discipline" such as hospitals and factory floors but it denies the general user flexibility and independence. If you are into accruing power unto yourself "thin clients" are certainly one of the ways to go. I prefer to control my own computing environment and do not wish to be dependent on third party suppliers anymore than is absolutely necessary. Been there and done that already. As for the cost improvements, I suggest that these are currently largely fictitious. In order to assure continuous uninterrupted internet service, I still have to rely on redundant systems and redundant ISP's. I do not think that I am in the minority on this one. Redundancy is expensive! The "thin client" model is just another variation of X-terminals which never occupied more than a niche in the past. It never really caught on even in intranets. The Andersen report and the EDS report should not be taken at face value, uncritically as you seem to be promoting. but then you have been promoting CPQ uncritically for several years as well. So what is new? Regards, JK