Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (66687)	7/26/1999 4:09:00 PM
From: Elmer	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1574002

Re: "There you go again coming from a place of confusion and contradiction like last night. We already know that intc is taking back market share in the low end through the implementation, we suspect, of predatory pricing procedures. In the meantime the K7's are intended for the high end. So what was your point?" You are still one confused dude. I know this may be a shock but this forum is not addressed personally to you. The point is that AMD is losing ground at an accelerating rate and their MIA-thalon (tm EPHUD) is not filling the gap. EP

To: tejek who wrote (66687)	7/26/1999 6:20:00 PM
From: herb will	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1574002

tejek, In re: "We already know that intc is taking back market share in the low end through the implementation, we suspect, of predatory pricing procedures." Predatory pricing! Do you say predatory pricing? It has been established countless times in this forum and backed with fact that Intel pricing is based on cost reductions, not predatory pricing -- that AMD instigated the 25% less than Intel from the getgo -- that AMD suffered from production screwups and therefore lost market share -- that AMD's k6 line is old, tired, unwanted and has nowhere to go. What has not been established so far is why so many of the AMD Zealots on this board are so fond of losing money! Herb

To: tejek who wrote (66687)	7/26/1999 6:25:00 PM
From: herb will	Respond to of 1574002

tejek,In re: "We already know that intc is taking back market share in the low end through the implementation, we suspect, of predatory pricing procedures." Predatory pricing! Do you say predatory pricing? It has been established countless times in this forum and backed with fact that Intel pricing is based on cost reductions, not predatory pricing -- that AMD instigated the 25% less than Intel from the getgo -- that AMD suffered from production screwups and therefore lost market share -- that AMD's k6 line is old, tired, unwanted and has nowhere to go. What has not been established so far is why so many of the AMD zealots on this board are so fond of losing money! Herb