Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: herb will who wrote (66701)	7/26/1999 8:07:00 PM
From: Cirruslvr	Respond to of 1574239

Herb - RE: "Intel's gross margins were 59% in Q1 and Q2 and will be in excess of 60% the remainder of the year. If Intel were guilty of predatory pricing that would reflect in their gorss margins which it does not." No one has said Intel is guilty of predatory pricing across the board. This predatory debate seems futile unless a clear defination of predatory is stated. It is clear almost everyone has a different interpretation of the word.

To: herb will who wrote (66701)	7/26/1999 8:19:00 PM
From: Ali Chen	Respond to of 1574239

Will, <..in fact I worry. Then again it was you that brought this charade about predatory pricing.> You worry so much that it constipates all your abilitities, to read in particular. You wrote: "What has not been established so far is why so many of the AMD Zealots on this board are so fond of losing money!" and got into your face: "Frankly that isn't any of your business. And I am not sure why you would care in the first place." This reply has nothing to do with alleged predatory pricing, and don't try to squirm and change subjects. Once again: my money is not your business. Is it clear now?

To: herb will who wrote (66701)	7/27/1999 11:38:00 AM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574239

<< Intel's gross margins were 59% in Q1 and Q2 and will be in excess of 60% the remainder of the year. If Intel were guilty of predatory pricing that would reflect in their gorss margins which it does not.>> I recommend that that you read the Businessweek article that first brought up the issue of predatory pricing. It was in an issue sometime in the last 3 or 4 weeks. They briefly discuss how overall operating costs can be manipulated to cover predatory pricing. <<"Frankly that isn't any of your business. And I am not sure why you would care in the first place.">> <<Well, thanks for the admission but I do care in fact I worry.>> I appreciate the sentiment but quite a while ago my parents told me if I make it, I can invest it. They seem okay with that decision so I encourage you not to worry. << Then again it was you that brought this charade about predatory pricing.>> Wrong again. One more time...... Businessweek brought the issue up in an article approximately 3 or 4 weeks ago. (I think Businessweek was worried that intc may get into trouble again with the Dept of Justice.) BTW don't you intc longs read anything besides the intc newsletter. ted