Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: richard surckla who wrote (25777)	7/27/1999 12:03:00 AM
From: richard surckla	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 93625

Go read it all. Much too much to post... baznet.freeserve.co.uk

To: richard surckla who wrote (25777)	7/27/1999 4:13:00 AM
From: Ian Anderson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

On the subject of Dual Celeron processors in a system I have this working in my system, with dual Celeron 300MHz (Slot 1) and run NT very successfully on it. However it is non trivial to make this work! If definitely does not work if you take two processors as delivered from Intel, and plug them in a standard dual processor motherboard. To make mine work I had to take off the heatsinks, drill out a connection on the pcb of the processor module (0.3mm drill!) , and add two very fine pieces of wire. These restore the connections Intel deliberately left off to disable the multiprocessor features of the chip. This is not a task for the unskilled! Of course it could be that they forgot to nobble the socket 370 parts, but somehow I doubt it. Ian