SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: DSPetry who wrote (23570)7/27/1999 11:01:00 AM
From: Janice Shell  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 26163
 
Isn't it, though? I can just guess where that information came from. See:

To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell (3294 )
From: Kerry J. Carmichael
Tuesday, Jul 27 1999 5:43AM ET
Reply # of 3305

Jeff,

Here is the first mention of "clute" that I can find on SI. Note the date (June 6, 1999) and
who posted it (Spider Valdez).

exchange2000.com

Here is the first post on SI, which happens to refer to a post from Raging Bull dated June
25, 1999 that links Janice Shell with the town of Clute, TX in a letter dated June 12, 1999.
While the letter itself is dated two days prior to the HITT filing, the posting of the letter didn't
occur until 11 days after the HITT lawsuit was filed (unless there is another as yet identified
reference on one of the Raging Bull threads).

exchange2000.com

From the HITT filing, note that it is dated June 14, 1999, or a full 8 days subsequent to the
initial mention of "clute", and 11 days prior to the public linking of Janice Shell with Clute,
TX. The filing also includes the Clute, TX reference.

exchange2000.com

Note the next mention on SI of "clute" is dated June 14, 1999 and is posted by Rico Staris.

exchange2000.com

Note that the Staris reply is to a post by DSPetry, which is a HITT PR announcing their
legal actions, also dated June 14th. This means that the PR and the HITT legal filing
occurred on the same day. The HITT PR contains the following quote:

The Company would also like to gratefully acknowledge the substantial assistance it has
received from various persons throughout the country in investigating the Internet activity by
the Defendants and others, and welcomes further contact from individuals with knowledge
of this cybersmear campaign.

exchange2000.com

Note that this PR never mentions "clute". Further note that other people posted on the HITT
thread that they tried to access a copy of the legal filing by HITT's lawyers and were
rebuffed by the court or its' representatives. Therefore, it would appear that it was
impossible to get an early copy of the HITT filing.

Hmmm... I wonder where HITT got the relevent information on Clute, TX. Or vice-versa
maybe?

KJC


#reply-10665926

and

#reply-10668982

You guys could be in real trouble, y'know? Expect to be deposed.