SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Knight/Trimark Group, Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth R Miller who wrote (2832)7/27/1999 11:39:00 PM
From: Sir Francis Drake  Respond to of 10027
 
OT Ken, I don't follow WITC closely enough to make any sensible remarks about its price movements, but from what I do know about the business, they seem a fine company. I actually considered buying into WITC back in mid June, but instead decided to jump into NITE (which I did at around the 42 level... I bought it several times) - in retrospect I made a collossal mistake (even though I sold that batch of NITE at just above 60); clearly, WITC was the better bet. Oh well - I'm sad to report that this happens rather often to me whenever I try to pick which stock will run faster (sort of like always picking the slowest checkout line at the supermarket). Still, to me at the time WITC was really a momentum play, and I didn't pay a whole hell of a lot of attention to the FA (I just made sure it wasn't some total fraud). However, since I jumped on NITE, I didn't follow WITC too carefully, and don't feel qualified to give firm trading guidance. I like it based on preliminary FA - but I stress *preliminary*.

Morgan