SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : IATV-ACTV Digital Convergence Software-HyperTV -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Eqmx who wrote (5725)7/28/1999 1:35:00 AM
From: dwight martin  Respond to of 13157
 
Going thru my old E-Mail, from TBTF (http://www.tbtf.com)


..@Home to limit upstream bandwidth
The free lunch is running out for the early cable adopters
The cable Internet provider is fighting a PR backlash [30] after news
leaked of a planned nationwide bandwidth cap, for upstream data, of
128K. An internal @Home memo [31] intended for cable system operators
was posted to Usenet. It details the company's strategy for handling
the anticipated customer firestorm once the policy (which the memo
calls the ONadvantage Upstream Enhancement) is announced nationwide.

@Home first instituted such a cap in Fremont, CA, one of the first
communities to see widespread adoption of the cable service. The
initial high upstream bandwidth (1 Mbit/sec.) and the "always-on"
nature of the service tempted an abnormally high proportion of
Fremont customers to commit what @Home calls "subscriber abuse"-
operating Web servers, Shoutcast servers, and FTP warez depots out
of their homes. (That's a funny term, "subscriber abuse"; from a
subscriber's point of view the label could as easily fit @Home's
policy.)

For a clear-headed look at some of the real issues of bandwidth and
average subscriber behavior, read Restil's posting in this Slashdot
discussion [32].

[30] internetnews.com
[31] x24.deja.com[ST_rn=ps]/getdoc.xp?AN=487238496&CONTEXT=930191437.185663528&hitnum=15
[32] slashdot.org