Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : WINR-Secure Banking to Global Internet Gaming & E-Commerce -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: InOverMyHead who wrote (5788)	7/28/1999 11:00:00 AM
From: Sportfish	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6545

Greed & Fear... as a byproduct of perception. Reality/actuality often has less to do with a stock's rise/fall than does one's perception of reality. People read the same PRs, listen to the same conference calls & hear/see things differently. Then greed, fear, hope, anxiety... even anger kick in. I have sold POS stocks at a loss that are now worth triple the $$, while solid companies seem to only linger (SETO, e.g.). If WINR is indeed as solid as we perceive, we are wise to hold in hope. That does not guarantee anything, but the other options are perhaps even more risky. At least in the Penny Arena. Great thread... one of the better ones. Sportfish... long 5k.

To: InOverMyHead who wrote (5788)	7/28/1999 1:16:00 PM
From: Dave Gore	Respond to of 6545

Even though WINR is not a Gaming company, here's why I-net gaming will likely never been outlawed or heavily regulated even INTERNET GAMBLING : Popular, Inexorable, and (Eventually) Legal by Tom W. Bell Tom W. Bell is an assistant professor at Chapman University School of Law and an adjunct scholar of the Cato Institute. He is coeditor with Solveig Singleton of Regulators' Revenge: The Future of Telecommunications Deregulation (Cato Institute, 1998). Executive Summary The Internet offers new and better access to something that American consumers demand in spades: gambling. Lawmakers and prohibitionists can neither effectively stop Internet gambling nor justify their attempts to do so. In the long run it will, like so many other forms of gambling, almost certainly become legal. In the short run, however, Internet gambling faces some formidable opponents. As a market activity devoted to the pursuit of happiness, Internet gambling draws support from neither Democrats nor Republicans. As an upstart competitor to entrenched gambling interests, both public and private, Internet gambling threatens some very powerful lobbies. Not surprisingly, Congress has been considering bills that would prohibit Internet gambling. But the architecture of the Internet makes prohibition easy to evade and impossible to enforce. As an international network, moreover, the Internet offers instant detours around domestic bans. Consumer demand and lost tax revenue will create enormous political pressure for legalization, which we should welcome if only for its beneficial policy impacts on network development and its consumer benefits. We should also welcome it for a more basic reason: as the Founders recognized, our rights to peaceably dispose of our property include the right to gamble