SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Celera Genomics (CRA) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mike McFarland who wrote (6)7/28/1999 8:15:00 PM
From: Dr Goodhybe  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 746
 
MMF copied a Celera newslink:
"Celera Genomics ... announced today that it has completed one million sequences, the equivalent of over 500 million base pairs -- letters of genetic code -- of Drosophila melanogaster, the fruit fly..."

Their estimate of the size of the genome (165 Mb total; 120 Mb euchromatic) is correct, but to say that they have four-fold coverage of the euchromatic portion of the genome and aren't finished yet (that "Celera expects to complete the random sequencing phase of Drosophila in early September ... entail[ing] completing another 2 million sequences--or about 1 billion letters of genetic code...") doesn't fill me with confidence. It sounds like completion when they've gotten 1.5 Gb of sequence, or twelve-fold coverage, is no better (if not worse) than the coverage of sequence assembly in existing government and academic genome centers (6-8 fold coverage is considered the usual value [Lander & Waterman]).

I thought Celera was supposed to have this really rip-roaring combination shotgunning & BAC-end sequencing approach that was supposed to reduce the needed sequence coverage dramatically (as discussed by Myers in his talk at GSAC-X last September 19th in Miami). I suppose they're to be commended for their high-throughput, but where's the expected efficiency of genomic sequence assembly?

Doctor Goodhybe