SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim McMannis who wrote (86272)7/28/1999 4:47:00 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 186894
 
Jim, you might be interested in this. It's taken from a USA Today commentary arguing for tax cuts:

usatoday.com

Speaking of investments, there's another reason why we might want to cut corporate taxes. T.J. Rodgers is the CEO of Cypress Semiconductor, a computer chip company in Silicon Valley. In a recent letter to the HouseBudget Committee, here's how he made the argument: “Consider the effect when the Clinton-Gore administration raised the tax on Silicon Valley companies from 35% to 36%. Vice-President Gore basks in the technology image that a few Silicon Valley leaders have given him. But that extra 1% tax Al Gore levied on Silicon Valley takes away billions of dollars from Silicon Valley—over $400 million a year from Intel alone. Consider that corporate tax on Intel a choice: either Intel invests its own profits, or surrenders those profits as taxes to be invested by the government. Intel's $400 million will be invested; raising or lowering taxes just decides who invests it. From that perspective, we have the preposterous claim that high-tech VP Al Gore can do better by investing the $400 million than could Intel's CEO, Craig Barrett. I state the obvious: Every American would be better off if Craig Barrett invested the $400 million.”

Is Intel's investing really good for America? Well, Barrett would likely invest the money in new chip factories, new hires, and start-up Internet companies. Intel invests about a billion dollars a year in small companies developing new technology. But actually, it's really not about Intel. Pick a company and consider whether its investments will create more jobs and more wealth than government spending does.


Tenchusatsu

P.S. - T.J. Rodgers' illustration does make one assumption. He's assuming that every CEO whose company benefits from tax cuts is as capable as someone like Craig Barrett. Imagine what would happen to the $400 million had it gone to Jerry Sanders! (sorry, couldn't resist)