SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : HITSGALORE.COM (HITT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mighty_Mezz who wrote (3149)7/28/1999 3:49:00 PM
From: Q.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 7056
 
Actually, the going concern was not given a week ago, it was given April 14, 1999. And it applied to the financial condition on 12/31/98, which was before the March 19 reverse merger. So it applied to SCMI's financial statements, rather than HITT's. The auditor was never required to audit the statements of HITT subsequent to the merger.

I'm not disputing in any way the negative meaning of the auditor's resigning. It means that the auditor doesn't want Hitsgalore as a client. The resignation, and the reason given, are not good news for HITT shareholders.

The going concern is a different matter. Perhaps some readers were confused by this. Companies usually follow a prescribed formula to report when there is a change of auditor for the company: the 8-k includes a statement of whether the auditor had given a qualified opinion (in this case the going concern in April) and whether there had been disagreements between the auditor and the client. The client followed the usual formula in wording its 8-k.

Here's the auditor's opinion from the 10k

edgar-online.com

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Board of Directors
Hitsgalore.com, Inc.
Rancho Cucamonga, CA

We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of Hitsgalore.com, Inc.
(formerly Systems Communications, Inc.) and Subsidiaries as of December 31,
1998 and 1997,
and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes
in stockholders' deficit and cash flows for the years then ended. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based
on our audit.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.
An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position
of Hitsgalore.com, Inc. (formerly Systems Communications, Inc.) and
Subsidiaries at December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the consolidated results of
their operations and their cash flows for the years ended December 31, 1998
and 1997, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared
assuming that Hitsgalore.com, Inc. (formerly Systems Communications, Inc.)
and Subsidiaries will continue as a going concern. As more fully described in
Note 3, the Company has incurred operating losses during each of the years in
the three-year period ended December 31, 1998 and has a working capital
deficiency and stockholders' equity deficiency at December 31, 1998. These
conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as
a going concern.
The consolidated financial statements do not include any
adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and
classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities
that may result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ Moore Stephens Lovelace, P.A.

Orlando, Florida
April 14, 1999