Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jbe who wrote (47581)	7/28/1999 3:45:00 PM
From: Neocon	Respond to of 108807

Yes, I think you are right to emphasize the physical characteristics...and the glamour<g>...

To: jbe who wrote (47581)	7/28/1999 3:52:00 PM
From: Zoltan!	Respond to of 108807

>>And too bald! And too old! And too indecisive. You may say reflective, but I've read that III(?) knew both sides of every argument but had little ability to come to a determination. Many blame Stevenson for one of JFK1's early foreign policy disasters, the Bay of Pigs, in which III basically blackmailed Kennedy into withdrawing support from the men JFK1 sent in. I do not think Kennedy appreciated that prima donnadom. I wonder how long III lasted after that.

To: jbe who wrote (47581)	7/28/1999 3:53:00 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

You might like this addendum, from the JFKJr. thread: There is an essay by Norman Mailer called "Superman in the Supermarket", which he published in Esquire, and is collected (if i recall correctly) in the book "Cannibals and Christians". He is covering the Democratic convention, and deciding that he prefers Kennedy, a middle of the road Senator with a not very distinguished legislative record, to Adlai Stevenson, the darling of anti- communist liberal intellectuals. His take is that electing Kennedy would be "an existential event", that it would release the national psyche, and make us once more adventurous. To Mailer, the ultimate issues would be Kennedy's virility, youth, vitality, and patrician air, to give us a new sense of ourselves. And, of course, it is just the mythic aspect of the Kennedy presidency that has been the most important. When he was slain, many people felt as if an era had been aborted, and the traumas of the decade of the Sixties have subsequently been traced back, mostly fancifully, to the assassination. Oliver Stone has bought, hook, line, and sinker, that Kennedy was contemplating getting us out of Vietnam, and other progressive agenda items, that caused "The Beast" to get rid of him, but even those who admit that it is uncertain how thing would have differed had he lived have often felt as if the trauma radiated other traumas, until America was on the brink of chaos...