SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elmer who wrote (66850)7/29/1999 9:44:00 AM
From: Cirruslvr  Respond to of 1576881
 
Elmer - RE: "The 667 MHz Alpha is there and posts 32.1 on SPECInt95. That places it behind HP which comes in at 34.0"

I see you are focusing on SPECInt these days.



To: Elmer who wrote (66850)7/30/1999 4:45:00 PM
From: Rob Young  Respond to of 1576881
 
Wrong. The 667 MHz Alpha is there and posts 32.1 on SPECInt95. That places it behind HP which comes in at 34.0

specbench.org

The 667 MHz Alpha is the first one listed.

---

But Elmer .. as we went over in another thread .. the 667 MHz
21264 does much better if it isn't running Bill's Swill...

www1.compaq.com!ob~8150_1_1,00.html

a fast (222 MHz) 4 MB L2 cache, SPECint/fp 37/67
(est.) for unparalleled computational performance

They should be posted in the next 2 weeks. So today, HP does have
a lead. That N4000 though is a $60000 box... the XP1000 can be
had for less than $8000 but the spec box costs more than that.

Interestingly.. with Samsung and IBM coming out with much faster
and smaller feature (.18) micron by year-end (IBM copper) see:

techweb.com

I'm willing to bet Alpha regains the performance crown and doesn't
give it up for at least 3 years.. EV7 (21364) is less than a year away
and promises 70+ Int, 120+ fp.

In we did just a linear ramp from 37/67 at 667 MHz (not a bad approximation for integer scaling) an IBM 1 GHz copper EV68 would do:

55.5 SpecInt95
100.5 SpecFp95

Not a bad part to ring in the new year, eh?

Rob



To: Elmer who wrote (66850)7/31/1999 5:00:00 PM
From: Cirruslvr  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1576881
 
Elmer - "The 667 MHz Alpha is there and posts 32.1 on SPECInt95. That places it behind HP which comes in at 34.0"

Since you are focusing on Integer, check out this info (which was already posted by Dan) taken from the German magazine C't heise.de, rewritten in English by Ace's aceshardware.com -

"They have that when 700mhz K7 is feed with 2MB full speed offdie caches like the current XEONs it scores a 31 on the specint95 beating even PA-8500's 30.8."

According to specbench.org the PA-8500 scores a 30.8 on SPECint_95, so I assume that is the number C't is comparing the Athlon's score to.

Yes, there is no such thing as a 700MHz Athlon w/full speed off die cache, but it paints an awesome picture showing what the Athlon is capable of.