SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: James Fulop who wrote (25929)7/29/1999 10:17:00 AM
From: richard surckla  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93625
 
The Register...


Posted 29/07/99 10:48am by Drew Cullen

Rambus to win memory war

PC133 may be winning the memory battle, but it certainly won't win the war against
Rambus, according to Cahners In-Stat Group.

The market research firm predicts Rambus will "capture the leading market share
over the next several years".

It forecasts 60 per cent market share, but then sits on a couple of fences with some
scenarios under which competing architectures could "capture sockets currently
forecasted for RDRAM". This could see RDRAM end up with anything between 33
and 73 per cent of the memory market.

Steve Cullen, principal DRAM analyst for Cahners, says: "Contrary to what other firms
are saying, we believe it is not a question of whether Rambus will be successful, but
rather when. RDRAM has a significant advantage in bandwidth per pin that helps to
satisfy processors' insatiable appetite for data. Rambus will be a major factor in
differentiating first-tier DRAM suppliers from the rest of the pack. DRAM suppliers that
do not adopt Rambus will see shrinking market share for PC DRAM and suffer overall
dropping unit volumes."

Intel is bankrolling Rambus to the tune of $1 billion and its marketing and distribution
muscle will ensure a big take-up for the technology, according to Cahners.

See also
Rambus real loser in PC133 wars
What do Micron, Samsung and Rambus have in common?
PC-133 wins the day in old Taipei
What the hell is Camino and Rambus all about?







Bootnotes: Industry Gossip

The Register Bulletin Board

Search and view the Old Site

Links to Semiconductor Sites

Intel desktop chip prices

Intel mobile chip prices

Intel Server Roadmap

Celeron trashes PII in new
RegMarkâ„¢ tests

How Intel regards the press --
official

If you want daily updates on
news, enter your email address
below, then click the 'Join List'
button.


Powered by ListBot

The Register and its contents are copyright © 1999, Situation Publishing. All rights reserved.
Mail: 20-22 Maddox Street, London, W1R 9PG. Tel: +44 (0)171 499 2264 Fax: +44 (0)171 4



To: James Fulop who wrote (25929)7/29/1999 11:42:00 AM
From: John Stichnoth  Respond to of 93625
 
James, I think any short-term action in intc is related to market share on the low end. bwdik?



To: James Fulop who wrote (25929)7/31/1999 10:58:00 AM
From: Steve Lee  Respond to of 93625
 
INTC is not a fund and an investment from INTC is far from a guarantee that the RMBS stock price will increase. INTC invested in MRVC and they plummetted. And most people still havent heard of MRVC anyway.

You said:

As INTC barrels ahead to maybe a new high amidst a so-so market environment, does anybody think the market is telling us that the possibility of Intel's huge investment in Rambus may be just on the mark (or at least not off the mark?) Or are there so many other factors affecting INTC (such as overall strength in the chip sector) that we cannot make any sweeping statements regarding its price and Rambus? Just curious what others think here. Thanks