Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : TSIG.com TIGI (formerly TSIG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Suzanne Newsome who wrote (33022)	7/29/1999 4:18:00 PM
From: Tom	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 44908

Hi Suzanne: Alyce/Sword is a disinformation artist. A good disinfo artist mixes truth, half-truth, and lies. She (let's just call her "she" for convenience sake), has spent an AWFUL lot of time on this little company. As a result, she appears to be knowledgeable about certain aspects of TSIG which ARE of interest to me. However, as we all know, she is not to be trusted. She turns on a dime. The recent 180 degree turn is the second one in less than a month. Clearly P&D. This does not mean she doesn't have SOMETHING to offer. Unfortunately, she uses her talents for the "dark side", and anyone who listens to her better be able to sift through the b.s. Although we would all love to have a 23 cent floor, to believe that Alyce was told this, one would also have to believe that there is a leak which resulted in her knowledge. Ironically, part of her recent complaints about Gordon included her statement that there was intentional leakage. If so, who was telling us about the 23 cents? Alyce was...lol... Meanwhile Zeeeeave (name intentionally mispelled) is nowhere to be found on the TSIG thread. We are not at subpennies. There has not been a 100 for 1 reverse split. While we are not out of the woods yet, it appears that the complete "death spiral" has simply not occurred. Rather, it appears that we have been given a buying opportunity that COULD (repeat COULD) turn out to be very lucrative for us. Assuming that we top out at 150 million shares, I am concerned about the remaining 150 million. We need to keep our eyes focused on the share count. Let's be positive about the future of what can be a great company, but let us also keep an eye on the store. We are also still waiting for a response to "those" questions... Tom