SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : AUTOHOME, Inc -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jing Qian who wrote (13110)7/29/1999 7:53:00 PM
From: Michael P. Michaud  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 29970
 
<<< ATHM could have multiplied 10 folds before the grand crash of 2002.>>>

so far it has divided by more than 2 fold, why couldn't it divide by 10 fold by 2002?? the trend is down, not up?

<<<You refused to admit that you don't have the ability to predict the future like anybody. >>>

Jing, He has stated he cannot predict the future, He has stated this is a bear market. Have you made any money since February?? Be honest... I havn't lost any, thanks to the AH.
Shit, someone stop me ..I'm being grateful to someone trying to help me.




To: Jing Qian who wrote (13110)7/29/1999 9:26:00 PM
From: ahhaha  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 29970
 
I want you to show me why lowering the rate is not revenue maximizing. I realize this goes against what you have chosen to believe. How can you take an opposite view and prove it? Did you know that it is common in proof theory to assert the opposite and see if you can logically deduce a contradiction? You can apply this reductio reasoning by assuming a lower rate. What does it gain vs what does it lose?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News