SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Globalstar Telecommunications Limited GSAT -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: djane who wrote (6234)7/30/1999 7:45:00 AM
From: Jeff Vayda  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 29987
 
Djane: From your ICO post: Class B ordinary shares would be created and would have 10 votes per share. They would be similar in all other rights to class A shares.
ICO's currently outstanding ordinary shares would be redesignated as class A ordinary shares and would continue to have one vote per share. To protect the class A shareholders, the class A shares would have the right to elect 40 percent of ICO's board of directors, as long as the class B shares represent more than 50 percent of the company's total voting power.
The new class B shares would be purchased for $5.00 per share. Strategic investors who deliver to the company binding subscription agreements by August 10 would also receive a warrant to buy one class A share for each class B share purchased. The warrants could be exercised for one year at $3.00 for each class A ordinary share.


If you bought one share on the market you pay $7.25 for 1 vote in ICO. If the Boys Club buys their one class B share (and the associated class A that goes with it) they pay $0.72 for 1 vote. Thats what they call 'protecting' the class A shareholder? I would not like to see what they call 'screwing' the class A shareholder!

Jeff Vayda



To: djane who wrote (6234)7/30/1999 9:34:00 AM
From: djane  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 29987
 
NY Times G* ad. They mentioned this ad in the LOR CC. Has anyone seen it and was it the same as the WSJ ad?