Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (2443)	7/30/1999 5:59:00 AM
From: Neocon	Respond to of 769670

First, there were few Biblical references related to this debate. Once, a long time ago, I asked Jonathan Doe what he thought of various of the proof texts used from the Bible, since he was a pro- choice Evangelical, and it made me curious...Second, no one ever said that anyone who broke a commandment was automatically going to hell, and no one would have, since even the fundamentalists believe in the possibility of forgiveness. I certainly never said, nor even implied it, but argued that posting the commandments might help to confirm the value of ethics, and if there were people of different faiths, suggested that their sacred scripture be used in a similar way...I do not recall anyone equating restricting abortion and taxes. I do recall people saying that they should not have to subsidize an activity that they find so repugnant, which is rather different..Anyway, if you are comfortable in your attitude about the fetus, there is little reason for you to object to the re- post, which is mainly informational...