SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Loral Space & Communications -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: brian h who wrote (6552)7/29/1999 8:43:00 PM
From: Rocket Scientist  Respond to of 10852
 
I saw this PR stunt on the Loral politics thread, and carefully refrained from reposting it here <g>

The actual suit (which can be viewed at the Jucidial Watch website) was filed some time ago, apparently, supposedly on behalf of the heirs of a Loral shareholder (of 448 shares(!)) against BLS, the DNC, the Prez, Hillary and numerous others. It essentially claims BLS (mis)used the bonus he got at the time of the Loral/LMart deal to bribe WJC, et al into betraying the national security. It provides a nice vehicle for JW to gather in one quasi legal document all sorts of unsubstantiated and tenuously connected charges relying largely on press accounts which in turn relied on unnamed sources. I suppose it will be interesting, in a queasy sort of way, to watch how the legal system deals with this POS.

After reading through all the alleged high crimes, the actual remedy sought is sort of a letdown: restitution of BLS's 36M$ bonus and "actual and compensatory damages, treble damages, an award of attorneys fees and costs to Plaintiffs and Loral"

Well, who could argue with that!



To: brian h who wrote (6552)7/29/1999 9:32:00 PM
From: Nancy Haft  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10852
 
Does anyone know if a similar suit has been brought against Hughes?