SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: James Clarke who wrote (7886)7/29/1999 9:09:00 PM
From: Tomato  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78783
 
Jim,

Any long positions that might do well in a down environment, e.g. gold stocks or selective foreign stocks perhaps?



To: James Clarke who wrote (7886)7/30/1999 7:27:00 AM
From: valueminded  Respond to of 78783
 
James:

appreciate your list. I may add a few comments. Anyone short most of these stocks would have thrown in the towell. Even though they are pricey I would consider buying longer term puts on these stocks unless you can stomach the volatility if one increases by 30%. I have PVN short in my portfolio. I opted for EBAY vs AMZN as EBAY (imo) does not have a workable business model, whereas amzn can fool the investors with "growth at any price" model & the lack of proftiablity is already priced in the stock <g>

Notably lacking from your portfolio seemed to be some of the tech stocks - such as semi mfgs or computer (i consider commodity excetp maybe apple) mfgs.

fwiw



To: James Clarke who wrote (7886)7/30/1999 9:48:00 AM
From: Bob Rudd  Respond to of 78783
 
Jim: Would like to see your rationale on PVN TGLO GS SOC shorts. My quick glance showed TGLO and SOC shorts clearly left the station quite awhile ago, GS has pulled back and has premier brand, and PVN doesn't appear to have obvious flaws and insiders are buying. I'm not disagreeing with these shorts just eager to see what you see.
thanks,
bob



To: James Clarke who wrote (7886)7/30/1999 3:22:00 PM
From: Mike 2.0  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78783
 
James, SOC is still a short? The smart apples who correctly suspected Chainsaw Al was a channel-stuffing emperor with no clothes shorted when SOC was 50, have long covered their shorts and are on a beach somewhere forever. At 6 & change, and with Al bounced out the door, do you still see it going lower? Why? TIA