Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Enigma who wrote (38037)	7/29/1999 11:56:00 PM
From: banco$	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116759

Thanks dd, I'll see if I can find better info. tomorrow.

To: Enigma who wrote (38037)	7/30/1999 11:34:00 AM
From: Mike M2	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 116759

DD, there was a story in Forbes 3-4 yrs ago ? about a landlord's heirs who took a tenant to court to enforce a gold clause contract . The lease may have been for 99 yrs? signed 1920 ? The tenant ( I think it was an insurance co.) wanted to pay in cheap dollars. I believe the courts said the gold clause was enforceable ( ruled 1977?). the property was in a mid western city. Sorry for all the ? but the story is from memory but I feel that my recollection is essentially accurate. Perhaps someone wants to do a search in Forbes under gold clause - I am not a good searcher. Mike