SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : LAST MILE TECHNOLOGIES - Let's Discuss Them Here -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bernard Levy who wrote (4862)7/30/1999 8:23:00 AM
From: Frank A. Coluccio  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12823
 
Thanks, Bernard. I suppose that I should infer from your statement about MCOM that you have assessed their migration path concerning improvements in data rates, and none, in your opinion of any noteworthiness at least, exists?

Not sure I understand what you mean by "the place" (bolded) in the following statement:

"...the services occupy precisely the place that ultimately the w-CDMA standard will allow...

Do you mean the same point solution, the same spectrum, please explain.

By the way, and in case you haven't been told lately, your insights and comments in this sector are greatly appreciated here in the LM. I sense that it will become more so in the coming months as wireless begins to pick up speed. No pun intended.

Regards, Frank Coluccio



To: Bernard Levy who wrote (4862)7/30/1999 11:26:00 AM
From: John Stichnoth  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12823
 
Bernard--Can you explain "which" wcdma you're talking about? Sorry if this sounds like a strange question, but my sense is that some confusion is developing over this. Some argue, for instance, that wcdma doesn't even exist (vaporware). Others that in the final analysis wcdma will evolve to be practically identical to cdma2000.

I'd appreciate your comments.

Best,
JS