Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : MDA - Market Direction Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: HairBall who wrote (21535)	7/30/1999 11:50:00 AM
From: Mike Learner	Respond to of 99985

LG, Regarding what happened to gold Stocks in the great crash era (1929 - 1935), I finally found out through another SI member who referred me to this site: gold-eagle.com Thanks for your PM to me on this matter. ML

To: HairBall who wrote (21535)	7/30/1999 11:52:00 AM
From: Casaubon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 99985

OT LG, you did not respond to the logic of my argument. You have simply stated your opinion. If there is a cause of mental illness that can be removed, thus resulting in the eradication of mental illness, then the justness of the mental illness defense will have been proven. If someone chooses to murder, then I find it hard to defend that persons right to live. However, I question whether it is a good idea to let the gov't have the right to take someone's life. There just seems too much room for potential abuse. But that is my opinion, and a whole other topic. This is a very conflicted area in my mind, and not as black and white as throw the switch, throw the switch. If this had happened in TEXAS and one of the daytraders had a right to carry license...no one would have faulted the individual for taking Barton out I find the above scenario easier to justify, than the the gov't trying a man, finding him guilty, and then murdering him. Of course, the danger here is, rampant vigilanteeism.