To: Salt'n'Peppa who wrote (1522 ) 7/30/1999 12:22:00 PM From: Noneyet Read Replies (1) | Respond to
Like I said you choose to call names instead of providing information and answers. It's something like your convincing argument that fcm, fnet and this new third company franklin.net are in fact subsidiaries of one another. Until of course, fcm proved you wrong and provided a reason for the cause of that confusion / mistake on their website, and eventually corrected the error. While of course you continued to insist up until the correction, that your explanation about the meaning of subsidiary was accurate. The Videotape for Convincing Evidence and Absolute Proof of who has been more accurate in their assessment. I would look foolish if it were not for this one small insignificant item, wouldn't I. However, the following is an absolute fact that no argument can change. By the way this videotape represents a time in History that has been the biggest bull market known to mankind. Dispute that small fact with your name calling tactics. quicken.com
