SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : MDA - Market Direction Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: fedhead who wrote (21586)7/30/1999 6:57:00 PM
From: pater tenebrarum  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99985
 
Anindo: re. the SOX: Bernie Shaeffer has recently done a study that showed that the semiconductor group is indeed the sector that is the best relative performer during times of rising interest rates. i believe there is a simple reason for this: semiconductor stocks are the ultimate cyclicals. as rising rates typically denote strong economic activity, the cycle of the semis' business turns up. demand for DRAMs rises, and DRAM prices go up. since most DRAM producers are 'marginal' producers, whose production costs are close to the current (still depressed) price of DRAMs, their earnings tend to rise exponentially on even small increases in the price of their products. naturally an upturn in the cycle of the equipment manufacturers follows on the heels of this. however, the Sox has risen some 180% since October already, so the lions share of it's potential gains is probably behind it for this cycle. in recent years the semi stocks have tended to top out in odd and bottom in even years in a 2-year up/down cycle. so '99 would be a year for a top. whether we have already seen that top is of course open to question, but like Don says, if a stock market correction of some significance lies ahead, it would be highly unusual for the highflyers of the latest bull run not to be affected by it. currently they profit from the perceived upturn in Asia and the need for money to rotate into something. however, should stocks in general be shunned for safer havens all of a sudden they could very well correct sharply. you also have to consider that these stocks are now over-owned "crowded trades". only yesterday an analyst said on CNBC that one "must own" these stocks. that's usually a strong warning sign. the last time i heard "must own" on CNBC it concerned AOL, which was then trading at 175.

regards,

hb



To: fedhead who wrote (21586)7/30/1999 9:16:00 PM
From: donald sew  Respond to of 99985
 
Anindo,

I should have been clearer and stated a 10% correction in the SPX, which could mean the the NAZ may go lower.