Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dan3 who wrote (67123)	7/31/1999 9:53:00 AM
From: Dan3	Respond to of 1575614

amdzone offers a link to this electronically translated version of the recent c't article. translator.go.com It's so garbled that it's hard to be certain what is begin said, but if nothing else, it's funny. Here is a sample: As the following architecture article shows, is Athlon with 500 or 600 mc/s clearly under-required, so correctly he will probably blossom with 1 GHz and more. Probably could AMD manufacture now already faster processors, but why? In the AMD laboratories werkeln 700-MHz-Versionen in ' Xeon configurations ' with 2 MByte L2-Cache, the SPECint95-Werte of 31 and to beyond that obtain are (with it Athlon became even HPs PA-8500-Titanen the Integer performance crown entreissen, which obtains up-to-date 30.8 SPECint95). Only do not chip-corrode the suitable are finished yet. Start of next yearly wants to place the Irongate-R4 for RAM bus and Irongate-D4 for GDR SDRAM (double DATA rate) to AMD completely (the 4 is thereby for AGP 4x), so that such fast processors have an adequate memory to the page.