Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : SOUTHERNERA (t.SUF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Shaw who wrote (4247)	7/31/1999 2:03:00 PM
From: gemsearcher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7235

Hello Dean. The "M1 Battle" angle is , I agree , getting a little tiresome. I'm a little surprised that SUF agreed to participate as actively as they did in this story without securing some form of commitment from the reporter that that "slant" (old news that it is) would not dominate. The angle certainly doesn't give the impression that DB's is the JV partner of choice , something that I would imagine DB's would like to cultivate in in the Canadian market press. It does however make pretty clear to me at least that the site is very secure and that SUF is very much responsible for the efficient operation of the mine. Maybe this story is the final nail in the M1 debacle coffin. At least it gets the SUF name in the press - with hopefully good news forthcoming from Marsfontein exploration , Camafuca bulk sample and Messina - a little preparatory attention getting can only heighten awareness. Regards and a good weekend.