SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Daytrader goes Postal -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brander who wrote (143)7/31/1999 3:39:00 PM
From: gao seng  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 193
 
"Psychiatric Disorders, which mania falls under, is just one of the many etiologies of violent behavior"

I believe that is what I said, that mania is a cause of violent behavior, but not the only cause.

you also said: Now, concerning the original point. It is very well known by the medical community that antidepressants, when used by themselves, can induce a manic episode in a patient with bipolar affective disorder. This has been known for decades. Antidepressants should, in general, not be prescribed as the sole medication for a patient with bipolar affective disorder because of the risk of inducing a manic episode. This would be considered an improper usage of medications, not in line with the standards of medical care. This is consistent with my statement that psychotropic medications, when used according to accepted medical standards, do not induce violent behavior.

-- In the "American Journal of Psychiatry" 9-91 study, patients suffering Luvox-induced mania were not helped by the anti-mania drug lithium, indeed it seemed to make them worse. Only when the use of Luvox stopped did the patient's mania clear. Not only Luvox causes mania. In a letter published in the "American Journal of Psychiatry" (3/90, page 372), researcher Dr. Alan Lipschitz states:

Furthermore, the point I am making is on the effects of using antidepressants for not manic depressive types, such as adhd.



To: Brander who wrote (143)7/31/1999 5:45:00 PM
From: capitalistbeatnik  Respond to of 193
 
Obviously they don't because if they did then they'd be many more violent incidents given that millions of people are on SSRIs and other antidepressants.

You are absolutely right. This is just another example of someone using a tragedy to push an agenda. In the case of Columbine, some people said it was because the kids were atheist. Well, Barton wasn't.

Simple explanations are comforting because they avoid the next to examine complexity and uncertainty. While they may be comforting they are simply wrong.