SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : JDS Uniphase (JDSU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: MileHigh who wrote (692)7/31/1999 9:28:00 PM
From: jmanvegas  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 24042
 
MH: I don't believe we will see any cyclical trends in JDSU for quite awhile - they are expected to grow sequentially quarter over quarter 13%-17% for the next 2 years - they can't keep up with demand - that's the reason for the secondary - to expand production through acquisition or internally and to further expand their product lines for a one-stop total solution to their major customers, that being practically anyone who is anyone in the need for advanced fiber optic equipment. There is a tremendous cost of entry and limited people talent in this field so the barriers for entry are quite difficult. And on top of that, smallish float, tons of cash now, super balance sheet, tremendous top-line growth, and they make serious money on the bottom line. Go try and find an Internet stock that can even compete with JDSU. Is Ebay or Amazon worth 2-4 times the value of JDSU - just look at the numbers - it's utterly ridiculous - anyone can sell low-margined stuff on the Web or have auctions - not anyone can enter JDSU's business. Again, I see no cyclical problems with JDSU, maybe cyclical swings in the market which will affect all stocks, but JDSU should be a core position in one's portfolio, IMO.

jmanvegas



To: MileHigh who wrote (692)7/31/1999 11:03:00 PM
From: John Biddle  Respond to of 24042
 
Here's an interesting post from the SDLI thread:

beta.siliconinvestor.com

What do you guys think of this? He didn't get much response over there but I think the post deserves better. I for one would like to know where he's wrong.