Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (38113)	8/1/1999 3:47:00 AM
From: d:oug	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 116763

just in fun, using Ron Reece to cause exacerbation in others Ron, something you have knowned for a long time, and knowned but not acknowledged by many on this thread who are repelled by your posts, that you are gifted in controlling the mood and tempo of exchanges between you and opponents so that the appearence is that you are on the side of reason, and the other is deep in wild hysteria. Most likely the pay and working location would prevent you from a consideration to run for USA Congressman, but if you did decide for a go at it, you would be a shoe-in. A piece of cake, and US Senator would just be a short trip down the road. Imagine if you had the physical look of a President, as they do matter, in a short 10-15 years, about your age of 50-60, President of USA Ron Reece. Oops, I forgot one issue, in that you also have to be able to not only look the part, but very important, to speak to an audience. Now Ron, if you do not have a weak or squeaky voice, and you can talk the way you post, then its your for the going after, President USA. I will ofcourse not vote for you, but you will win easily. You could place Hutch in a position of Chairman of Economic Advisors with the understanding that eventho Hutch will only put in 10 hours a week, he will accomplish a regular full weeks work load. This will only be an small extra part time job for Hutch as he will remain in Canada doing as he has always. A dual citizenship for Hutch will be easy to get using all those loop holes in our government. But I got a feeling that Hutch regards his Canadian citizenship with too much respect to have the blood and guts and guns and violant nature of the USA on his conscious, so I'am sure a deal can be worked out in secret, with denials and lies easily accepted by most USA citizens. Doug

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (38113)	8/1/1999 5:59:00 PM
From: long-gone	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116763

<<I don't see the evidence of back room deals being presented. I'm not saying they don't occur, but obviously nothing has been documented that you could make a legal case out of.>> widely reported that the person who advised Blair for the BOE sale was senior VP of GS

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (38113)	8/1/1999 8:11:00 PM
From: long-gone	Respond to of 116763

<<I don't see the evidence of back room deals being presented. I'm not saying they don't occur, but obviously nothing has been documented that you could make a legal case out of.>> exchange2000.com

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (38113)	8/2/1999 1:02:00 AM
From: d:oug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116763

<<evidence & back room deals & nothing been documented>> Ron, I just got an e-mail telling me that the current issue of magazine BusinessWeek has an article about an on going investigation into a part of wall street that had some arrested or something. Sorry about above details as I don't know the past or current story and don't have access to the mazine on-line. A picture of the article has 3 traders in that monkey, see hear speak, no evil. << that you could make a legal case out of>> Also someplace in the article Golden Sacks is mentioned as one of those doing bad things, but as yet unproven or something. Bill Murphy mentioned in one of his GATA articles that it seems that whenever incorrect happenings of gold occure, Golden Sacks seemed to have been close by. Today was a good day for this thread in that a lot of good stuff was posted to try and counter some of your ideas and explainations and views. I once said, need to know the wrong before you can verify the correct. I also said that time will tell(as you did today), and also I take the same stand as you, I stand behind what I say and if later I am showned or proven to be wrong then I will accept that as part of the learning process and expand my knowledge and grow. Better to try and make mistakes than stay idle and guarantee no lost but also no win. Personal attacks hopefully are like the sting of a slap in the face, no real damage, hurts only a short time, and what lasts is controlled by how one wants to keep it a memory or look at it as nothing to build something with, and forgets it. Sometimes a situation exist in a form that an answer or solution should not be attempted. For example, the population of some very small and poor nations are extremely oppressed and treated rotten by a small number of people that control thru force of guns. 99.99% of citizens live in poverty with no medicine or food or shelter while these hoodlims drain the small riches of the country and put it into overseas bank account and live high on the hog. Now these sicker than sick evil men will accept help from other nations like the Red Cross in the form of food aid and medicine, to feed the starving masses, and sell 99% of it on black market for money for guns and bank accounts and high living. ok, 1 % reaches the people and keeps them "just" alive. So someone asked my to donate some money to give to Red Cross for food aid. I said no, and person asked me if it because 99% is ripped off. I said no, that its because 1 % does reach the citizens and it would be better if NO aid sent and put the citizens at death's door step. Person was shocked by my reply, and asked me if I was raceish and wanted these people to all die. I said NO, I wanted just the opposite, to have these people continue to all live and live at a better level. He replied to me ?????, and I said you are helping the evil ones hold their citizens in chains AND guaranteeing that the next generation will live in chains. Stop the food aid and the citizens will have no choice but to attack the evils ones and kill them all and then have the freedom to live. But to continue the food aid give the evil ones a money source and prevents the citizens from being pushed too close to edge. Stop giving the evil ones a money source and the citizens will either die thru starvation or choose to fight for their right to live. Good people helping evil ??? Doug