Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : HITSGALORE.COM (HITT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bob sims who wrote (3286)	8/2/1999 12:19:00 AM
From: Mighty_Mezz	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7056

bob - The documents have to do with LFT, which has lots to do with HITT. It was the LFT PRs which catapulted the stock past 20. Did the PR mention that the $100 mill letter of intent from LFT was non-binding? The SEC form did. Now HITT is posting earnings which seem to be based on IOU's from LFT. Face it, HITT and LFT are joined at the hip. If LFT turns out to be less than respectable, it reflects badly on HITT. When dealing with companies which have no history, the histories of the people involved can be the only measure of legitimacy. There! I answered your question. Now answer one of mine. Pick one. What lies were told by those being sued? Why isn't Bloomberg being named in the suit? What technology did Dorian develop? Did SCMI shareholders have a right to know Reed's past before allowing the merger? Why would LFT pay $20 later when they can buy for under 5 now? ...Mezz - [aka Mess, by people who think a non-binding letter of intent is a guaranteed investment, and company PR is always Truth.]