Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Charles R who wrote (67284)	8/2/1999 1:52:00 AM
From: Process Boy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578927

Chuck - <So PB, which part of you is not back yet. ;-)> The "Boy" part is back. Working back in to the "Process" part. :-) PB

To: Charles R who wrote (67284)	8/2/1999 8:40:00 AM
From: survivin	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1578927

Charles, was it you who asked for a definition of predatory pricing? Gwennap .." Even as it cut prices, AMD began losing business. Traditionally stingy Intel began offering big discounts off its already low Celeron list prices--anything to get a design win away from the competition. OEM sources report buying Celerons for as little as $40 earlier this year, despite a minimum list price of about $65." This article gives a nice summary of what went wrong in the first half. Also, Gwennap suggests it would be suicidal for intc to continue their price slashing given the limited supply of athlon's coming in the 2nd half. mdronline.com@19688684dyqftd/mpr/editorials/edit13_10.html