Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Eric L who wrote (4541)	8/2/1999 3:04:00 PM
From: DaveMG	Respond to of 54805

Eric, I apologize but it is important to have background, IMO, on the "Holy Wars" when trying to determine just how dominant CDMA will be (as an end to end wireless technology as opposed to an air interface) v GSM Sorry to keep hammering away on this but I just don't understand what you're saying. What do you mean by "end to end"? Both GSM and CDMA are air interfaces aren't they? The fact that today they operate on top of or in conjunction with differing underlying networks ie GSM-MAP and ANSI-41 isn't really germaine is it, especially since the ERICY/QCOM agreement, unless of course one thinks 3G is an industry hoax and GSM will continue to dominate.But then how does CDMA become the dominant interface? Overlays? What am I missing? perplexed as usual...Dave Just noticed your previous post...Sorry..