Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (67387)	8/2/1999 6:03:00 PM
From: kapkan4u	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573923

<Are you suggesting that we not respond and just ignore them?> Yes. Kap

To: tejek who wrote (67387)	8/2/1999 6:04:00 PM
From: DRBES	Respond to of 1573923

re: "It was my observation that the more they are ignored, the more hostile and denigrating they become. Does anyone else have any thoughts or suggestions?" Ignore them! At least try to. Regards, DARBES

To: tejek who wrote (67387)	8/2/1999 6:31:00 PM
From: Mani1	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573923

tejek, Kap, Kevin, This board has gotten way too personal. I personally could care less about how Paul's, Elmer's or any one else's investment is doing. I like this board because it is a decent source of relevant happenings and it is entertaining at times. But granted, looking at the comparisons of Intel and AMD's 15 years charts from Paul for the gigillion time, or listening to Elmer complain about foils, or looking at Yousef's and his <G>, after telling us about AMD's inferior process does get repetitive and dull, and serves no purpose. I like my method of reading most but responding to very few. I have found that the SI forum is full of very intelligent, thoughtful and courteous poster who are much better to communicate with through private messages. Contributing no more than a few times a day and ignoring rude, obnoxious and sarcastic comments works well for me. Mani