Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ali Chen who wrote (67392)	8/2/1999 6:38:00 PM
From: Elmer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1585939

Ali, this is what you said about Gordon Moore Message 10763553 "(e.g. G.Moore - co-founder) totally unloaded." You missed by 177,000,000 shares. You also missed by millions of shares for Andy Grove and others. I posted to you politely explaining how those numbers weren't accurate but you are too arrogant to except the facts. Why not just accept the fact that the Yahoo numbers are bogus and leave it at that? You'll save face. EP

To: Ali Chen who wrote (67392)	8/2/1999 6:54:00 PM
From: Windsock	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1585939

Ali the Absurd Re: "Why should I read the material... " Great idea, don't read the material if it conflicts with the statements of Ali the Absurd. This is what you stated in your prior post that you so kindly cited: "some (e.g. G.Moore - co-founder) totally unloaded." This statement is totally absurd and off by about $12 billion. What is your explanation for this inaccuracy? Earlier, you wanted my explanation and I delivered it. Now its your turn to explain. You were wrong about Moore, wrong about Barrett, wrong about Yu, and you are also wrong about "most acting officers were selling 100% of their vested options". Go read the materials and you may gain an understanding.