Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mani1 who wrote (67411)	8/2/1999 10:42:00 PM
From: Ali Chen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573954

<Any comments about the 1.7 core voltage (Paul, anyone!)?> The stated Core voltage is wrong. :)

To: Mani1 who wrote (67411)	8/2/1999 10:46:00 PM
From: Jim McMannis	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573954

RE:"Any comments about the 1.7 core voltage (Paul, anyone!)?" Wasn't Paul saying the Athlon was a 2.5v core and dissipated 60 watts at 500MHZ? Looks like 36.5w. At 1.7v @.25u and a higher MHz it seems that according to Yousefs law...AMD now has the superior process technology.

To: Mani1 who wrote (67411)	8/2/1999 10:49:00 PM
From: Charles R	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1573954

Mani, <I am surprised that no one has responded to this, ...> I am more surprised that no one commented on the 64-bit stuff (other than some traffic in private messages, I should add). This is the second time in row that this highly provocative topic is being ignored by the thread. Oh well, I guess the time for 64-bit architectures exciting this thread hasn't arrived yet. Chuck