Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : VICL (Vical Labs) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: D. Chapman who wrote (1112)	8/3/1999 12:09:00 PM
From: Scott H. Davis	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1972

D. This is what I was referring to <<Anyone want to talk... I've been busy in the lab... Send mail to jarst38@pitt.edu (this is where I am in med school/Ph.D. program>> I interpreted this to mean you wanted to take discussions off-line. The fact that you posted a school with and a .edu e-addr raised your credibility. Actually you have mis-interpreted me. I'm real up front/direct. Put yourself in my shoes. Soneone suddenly appears on a day after a significant announcement, on a day where an obvious short posted. Your post did not show either the detail orrientation of someone I expect going in the direction you are headed, not did you reflect common practives for academic writing. The healthcare journal articles are full of x-refs. And what was really suspicious aws the lact of healthcare posts before VICL. I don't post about retail, oil services, construction since I know nothing about them, and have never been in the industries. I am passonate about healthcare. My intent was never to antagonize you but to flesh you out - either you made the mistake of making serious charges without taking the time to post relevent details, which was sloppy and innappropriate, or you were a short. If I could embarase you prefessionally, I hoped you would post real details and substantive analysis. Finish your exams. Gather your thoughts. Post well, or don't bother. I'm not a hypster. While others on several threads encourage links to Raging Bull, I won't waste my time there anymore. The threads I've followed are nothing buy cheerleading & clueless hype. I exposed the huge flaw in a OTC financing plan & the companie's checkered past. I was dismissed. Stock hit $5 before the dump started. Now it's around .40. I realy do respect good analysis, even when it goes against one of my positions. And I detest games playing and repeated shallowness/hype even when it may benefite one of my positions (short term) Again, I was not trying to get you to stop posting. I did want you to take the time to think thru your posts, clarify your subject matter & offer support. I don't think that's unreasonable, nor anoagonistic. I did not mean to offend. Scott