Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Astrological Influences: Financial and Global Trends -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: philv who wrote (24)	8/3/1999 4:19:00 PM
From: Richnorth	Respond to of 538

Shallow thinking! A little bit off the mark, eh? It's just that astrologers are human after all. (Also, some astrologers may not be what they claim themselves to be. If that be the case, then time will expose them!) (BTW, I am not looking forward to have a wide following in case I hit it right on the head! <ggg>) The same astro chart may be interpreted differently, depending on the knowledge, experience, skill and intuitive power of the astrologer. However, what counts ultimately is whether he/she has been consistently correct over a period of time. (If someone beats me at chess a couple of times, I would not immediately consider him/her a better player than me. However, if he/she is able to win many more games than me over a relatively long period of time (i.e. is able to maintain a running plus score against me) then I would concede the other person to be the better player). So, who can we trust? Obviously the one who has established a good track record, eh? So, who can we trust? Are you implying that people are supposed to take an astrologer's prediction on blind faith everytime? Personally, I would just consider a "prediction" as a probability and act accordingly for what it is worth as it relates to my personal circumstances. This is the sensitive approach to applying astrological predictions.