Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Janice Shell who wrote (23595)	8/3/1999 6:24:00 PM
From: tonto	Respond to of 26163

Thanks Janice for the TVSI/AREE SEC enforcement notice. Pugs was irresponsible on that thread too, right on the heals of RMIL, and of course castigated anyone who did not agree with his version...<s> His pump and dump move with Big Dog angered quite a few honest investors. If you read through the posts you will see him hitting on the stock while selling the next day. His excuse was he was playing the mm's. Poor investors who did not know him... Amazing and sorry history of posts...from TVSI thread To: +JS (73 ) From: +Pugs Saturday, Feb 7 1998 11:22PM ET Reply # of 5296 <off> JS, RMIL is in the launching pad ready for take-off. You see the shareshakers, s martin for example, already slamming TVSI because Riley did the initial DD on it. They want to slam Riley & myself. Be prepared to hear the worst about TVSI just so some can discredit Riley & myself. the merger with RMCW was orchestrated to make RMCW a publically traded co., reverse merger, AND...to BUST THE SHORT!, a estimated ,naked,ILLEGAL shortposition of 5-6MM shares. The Floatis approx. 2.17MM shares,we have over 3MM called for and approx. 2.15MM in cert form. The co.is not trading. There is no halt. A $10MM cash infusion will be announced with some other cool stuff in a series of releases which will be strategically aligned with the commencement of trading. This is the last I will speak of RMIL on this thread, but I will say,Riley and myself have put alot of time & energy into RMIL...it is FOR REAL...all the shortsellers, share-shakers, unethical brokers, and under-cover MM's in the world can't change that. Riley nor myself are hyping RMIL , nor are we promoters...we've sweated this out with every other shareholder....and now the PAY-OFF!!! WE ARE BUSTING THAT SHORT,THRU DILIGENCE & SWEAT EQUITY!!!! Now...lets rockwith TVSI Pugs SOLIDARITY RMIL LONG TVSI Long Enuff

To: Janice Shell who wrote (23595)	8/3/1999 6:54:00 PM
From: tonto	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26163

There may be some confusion regarding auditors independence. ITEM 4. CHANGE IN REGISTRANT'S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT. In February of 1999, Amazon Natural Treasures, Inc. ("the Company") decided to change auditors due to the fact that the prior auditor is still due compensation from the previous audit and would lack independence. The SEC and the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants with regards to conducting an audit and issuing an audit report do not deem the prior auditors independent. The Company's management and financial direction set for the Company and its Shareholders have deemed the change of auditors to be an appropriate decision. Wonderful wording by the company which if one does not have prior knowledge regarding auditors independence would make it appear to be a decision the company made by simple choice. Auditors may not properly audit a company if they remain unpaid. This must be disclosed by the auditors and auditors initially address the company regarding their unpaid status. With $$$$$'s hanging over their heads, they could otherwise be influenced...an excellent rule to protect investors. By: panchovilla Reply To: 3121 by CarlW Tuesday, 3 Aug 1999 at 6:23 PM EDT Post # of 3125 Don't know the answers to any of those questions. The concept of firing an auditor because his independence is questionable as a result of the client not paying a fee is simply mind-boggling. Using that logic, it follows that an auditor should work for free, otherwise the payment of a fee might be considered an intrusion on the auditor's independent judgment. A bribe, if you will