SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : The New Qualcomm - a S&P500 company -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: gdichaz who wrote (487)8/3/1999 7:37:00 PM
From: Labrador  Respond to of 13582
 
I believe that MOT pays a lower royalty rate than others for QCOM ASIC chips. Accordingly, would the sales of ASICs by MOT cost QCOM revenues, or could MOT undercut QCOM's sales price?



To: gdichaz who wrote (487)8/3/1999 8:37:00 PM
From: JohnG  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13582
 
Gdichaz. There was a earlier comment by someone I felt at the time was credible that the suit arose partially because MOT had been using Pantec (SP) chips without putting the stipulated "Qualcom CDMA Technology" acknowledgment on the phones.
JohnG


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News