Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : AREE - Formerly TVSI -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Milk who wrote (5302)	8/4/1999 9:22:00 AM
From: tonto	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 6528

Milk, I note that smartin is posting on this thread. Smartin brought up very early the SEC # in Colorado and recognized the problems. Pugs pushed the "conservative" numbers angle repeatedly. It has been proven that those numbers were anything but conservative and the SEC took action. It is a timing issue. It makes clear that transgressions of early last yeat are now being addressed. The SEC is understaffed to keep current. I expect similar actions in the future. Some history from the early days may better explain what was posted and issued by just a few parties: Message 3421557 Message 3421799 To: +gtoland (697 ) From: +Pugs Friday, Feb 13 1998 11:58AM ET Reply # of 5303 ALL TVSI SHAREHOLDERS! _____________________ These guys are here to destroy any investment of mine or Rileys'. They are here to destroy our credibilty and , in doing so, to shake shares at RMIL. The good news is , in about 2 weeks they will be slamming RMIL full-time again when it starts trading again. But, I'm aware, like Morrison, the activity on this thread is hurting alot of 'innocent' bystanders. Riley & myself will not post here anymore hoping these cretins will leave the TVSI thread. RMIL shareholders communicate via an EMail thread, thats why these guys are here on TVSI, because they cannot communicate to us on the RMIL thread any longer. Don't let them do to TVSI what they've done @ RMIL. WE will win at RMIL, but it demanded much resolve. If you get caught up in their games, they'll de-rail your investment. Keep your eyes on the prize. TVSI is for real. !!! I spoke to Jonas today, who is a very nice guy, it was a first impression, but I trust him and allowed him to call my broker to verify the status of my TVSI position. TVSI is going to be a profitable investment, (note Pugs does not post trade but instead investment) but only if me & Riley stay in the shadows and hopefully these guys get bored!! All the Best!! Pugs TVSI LONG RMIL LONG SOLIDARITY!!! To: +TopCat (817 ) From: +Pugs Saturday, Feb 14 1998 1:09AM ET Reply # of 5303 TC I'll respond for the last time. TVSI is for real. As far as I know a reverse merger is perfectly legal and benefits the small public co. & the larger private co. As far as Fridays announcement, it is clear the merger will be beneficial and profitable. Enthusiasm focused on the 'merit' of the investment, the NAYS focused on me & Riley. I still the stock will hit .50 in the very near future. One MM from Calif. shorted this stock millions of shares after the run, obviously to cover cheap and pocket OUR profits! IMO, s martin, etc.SLAMS the stock in an attempt to TANK the stock. He is a SHARESHAKER. No one makes one BUY a stock....but MM's can & do short, naked if they have to and guys do SLAM stocks on their behalf. You won't admit to this, tho'Prestek sued MM's attempting to tank the stockon SI, Dempsey Mork hired Puhrty, Mawork 1 and ptm inc. to SLAM RMIL, and a guy on the CCEE thread was discovered to be a PR guy HIRED TO SLAM CCEE, YOU DON'T MENTION THAT! Why do you follow us? Why are you posting only on threads where we are shareholders? What is your deal!!! Just stay off the AWLT THREAD!!! Pugs LONG RMIL,TVSI, AWLT!!! To: +Just My Opinion (913 ) From: +tonto Sunday, Feb 15 1998 1:55PM ET Reply # of 5303 ... posting of false and misleading statements has become too common place and investors are getting killed. The SEC at least can halt trading on companies that do so, now we need to stop the quantity of posts. There are posters that love to use the terms yay and naysayers, and the glaring exclusion of truthsayer is not by mistake. Message 3452697 Message 3470306 boulderplanet.com