Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jan Crawley who wrote (71676)	8/3/1999 10:54:00 PM
From: Bilow	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

Hi Jan Crawley; Let my take a swing at "explaining" why a bond holder would want to keep his short... Right now, the bond holders have an in the money short, and a losing bond position. But the bond hasn't yet gone to zero, so they still have money available to lose on the bond. Consequently covering the short would leave them with a naked and dangerous (i.e. junk) bond position. Having an unhedged position like that is an unnecessary risk. In addition, if they are a taxable entity, covering the short will leave them with a short term capital gain. Now it is always possible that if they cover their short, that they could reshort at a higher price. But that would require a trader, not a hedger. Those of who actually try to make money trading know that sometimes you have to reenter your short at a lower price. The difference between the short at the higher price and the short at the lower price would be a loss (relative to their original position), just as if they had gone long in another account, (boxing the short) and then sold the long at a lower price. So to ensure that they actually would improve their position by covering (or boxing) the short they would have to ensure that they could reshort at a higher price. Of course that is something that it is not possible to ensure. (The claims of the perfect traders not withstanding.) If this explanation is insufficient, my apologies, I will fill out an example with the actual numbers, and the account values etc., at the end, showing the possible consequences of early coverage. -- Carl