SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Father Terrence who wrote (48858)8/3/1999 11:44:00 PM
From: Grainne  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 108807
 
<<Not name calling, just facts. Nobel Laureates in WHAT field? Climatology? If any other
field they are no more "expert" than any other layman. Check it out -- you'll see some
won their Nobel Prize for physics, chemistry, math, etc. They have no expertise in
Global Warming, they're just shooting their mouths off and trying to sound impressive. It
gets down to the fact they are voicing an opinion, which isn't science.>>

Oh, that is an interesting argument. Your organization of anti-taxation libertarians gathered a list of anyone who had a BA in any kind of science, and that is the supposedly impressive list of SCIENTISTS (many conservative wealthy medical doctors from the South, etc.) that Michael Cummings and other anti-global warming advocates bandy about when they want to try to impress the gullible around here.

Is there a doctoral degree in global warming, incidentally? I would think that REAL scientists from several fields would be pretty competent to analyze trends, study data, and form educated opinions.



To: Father Terrence who wrote (48858)8/4/1999 12:02:00 AM
From: epicure  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
Actually atmospheric chemists understand the subject pretty well and they are "surprise" classified as chemists.



To: Father Terrence who wrote (48858)8/4/1999 12:12:00 AM
From: jbe  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 108807
 
Re: Global Warming.

I do not know enough about this issue to get involved in a debate about it. I just want to point out that Nobelists who won awards for physics are just as well equipped to talk about the issue as Frederick Seitz, the "petition movement" man. Dr. Seitz is a distinguished scientist, but he too is "just a physicist."

As for the signatories of the "petition" he organized -- the only contribution he has evidently made to the anti-global warming cause -- he himself has said that only 1/3 of them have advanced degrees.