Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Discuss Year 2000 Issues -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ken who wrote (7674)	8/3/1999 11:46:00 PM
From: C.K. Houston	Respond to of 9818

ROFLMAO. You and bearcub are two peas in a pod. <Bear-your comment re:ck as a back-bitter-her comments re Cheky, Techg, and others' (and if you can believe it, even her old friend and pet Ron, imagine that!) she pmed me, I'd say you were spot on! I did not inform them of her back-stabbing personal tackless comments, as her kind of behavior is best left to her and her buds who wish to lower themselves to grade-school inner city schoolyard conduct. She also doesn't know that it got back to me how she has also been back-biting me to others thru email. But, she also doesn't know others she sends this little girlie type of gossipy and back-stabby chatty-chatty to don't all find it so adult-like either. Some southern women are known to be ladies, others engage in out-of-hearing gossip and back-nibbling, others in actual biting. This case is somewhere in the middle-maybe toward the southern extreme. I would call this 'chandalier chatter', if it didn't contain the back-stabbing part.> The part that I find most entertaining, is about my e-mailing all of these people. LOL I don't even know what function you use to send multiple emails out. Do you honestly think that I care about you and bearcub that much ... that I would type out 48 email addresses, and send them out individually??? Besides. What's the point? I don't have to spend the time to tell people that you two are idiots. You're doing it yourself publicly.

To: Ken who wrote (7674)	8/3/1999 11:54:00 PM
From: Ken	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9818

<<<e-mailing all of these people. LOL I don't even know what function you use to send multiple emails out. Do you honestly think that I care about you and bearcub that much ... that I would type out 48 email addresses, and send them out individually??? Besides. What's the point? I don't have to spend the time to tell people that you two are idiots. You're doing it yourself publicly.>>> Some southern women get and stay high. Some southern ladies stay sober! Ridiculously putting words in my mouth (anyone see major parallels here between cks habit and her pet Rons?) shows me which of the above two classifications ck is in, or to be nice, at least when she reads and replies to some/many/most postings (and of course, some of her never-again-private pms!

To: Ken who wrote (7674)	8/4/1999 12:15:00 AM
From: Ken	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9818

Oh, goodness gracious! I made an error! I said "email" instead of "pm", relating to cks pming others in her daily/weekly gossipy or back-stabbling/biting ritual! Of course, ck KNEW EXACTLY what I meant, so to divert others' attention away from her chatting about them behind their backs, she focused totally on an error I made. ck just attempted a diversion! I don't think it was a very good one. I think it was a very poor one. ck would not make a good military tactician. ck is much better suited being a member of the DAR than of special ops.

To: Ken who wrote (7674)	8/4/1999 1:10:00 AM
From: bearcub	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 9818

actually you can thank Janelle for spotting her behavior and calling her hand, ken. she said she knew someone like her in college and exposure was the only cure. so i tried it, and sure enough, c.k. houston's true colors came through. it must be a PMS thing instead of a pre y2k stress out thing, what do you think? she really disparaged ron reece behind his back? you are kidding!!! that would explain why she sticks up for him so loudly in public. i knew there was something peculiar about her over the top vocal defense of him for the last several days. down south, we call that behavior, guilt :) sorry she took some chunks out of your hide. i think you have people's best interests at heart, and i have enjoyed your levity and humor as well as your shared research. frankly, i'm still shaking my head over the post you made last night about the state official who came back from a conference bound and determined to try to save their city from a 24 hour incendiary future. that was serious stuff, ken and took courage to post. thank you. i hope even our physically challeged newbie took a few moments today to double and triple check her fire escape plans with her family and caregivers. now that you've posted that fire concern of yours, now more than ever, it is important to select a location where all the surviving family can meet when diaster of such magnitude strikes, so that one and all can know who is safe and who needs rescuing. are you going to move out of your area? fortunately, fire is not a concern where we've relocated. what a horrid way to lose everything. been there, done that. it wasn't fun. maybe c.k. will apologize to you for her pathetic attempt to impugn your character publically earlier this evening. Janelle and i actually feel sorry for her and all her money. how sad to only have a bank account to curl up with everynight! if money solved y2k, all those extra y2k fake money billions printed by the federal reserve might have bought us some of those GAO solutions in time to do some good for the usa population.