Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : AUTOHOME, Inc -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ahhaha who wrote (13453)	8/4/1999 3:26:00 AM
From: KW Wingman	Respond to of 29970

No Ahhaha, I have came to the conclusion that your amateur hour posts are for the most part worthless junk. In this case, Seymour - (the expert) <:} is right on, while your post is total trash. <:} You are an expert about talking about rising negatives. That is because you can only see negative when looking through your thick, heavy duty pessimistic lenses you wear in front of your s. brown glasses. Looking through rose-colored glasses is far better than looking through your nasty, s. brown, pessimistic glasses. Your s. brown glasses present a distorted, brown, negative vision of all objects and subjects within their small field of view. Go back to the bunker, y2k is coming, you may need to stock up on a few more items such as matches. Don't forget to stockpile some heavy weapons "they" may be coming for you. Anyway, at least in the bunker that damn rain cloud wont be raining on you and it won't get your gold shares wet. Wingman

To: ahhaha who wrote (13453)	8/4/1999 11:29:00 PM
From: Solid	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 29970

<That article is junk. Seymour has proven he is clueless about the rising negatives. You are looking through rose-colored glasses. That's what needing an investment does to you. > Clueless or bias? I held PSIX for quite a while. Finally threw in the towel last spring after a very long time languishing at the bottom. Many 'learned, informed sources' saw it as an over-rated has been that would not fly. I had researched it myself. I was positive on it and saw the INET at the time, as perceived negative in the public eye and awaited a change in sentiment. I finally succumbed to the belief that maybe I'd already waited too long. I was mistaken. The perception changed. Had the fundamentals of the company altered, I'd say no. It came shortly after I let it go. From the 7 I sold at, yesterday it was 47. How high has it been? Got me, I did not look back after the scalding. I no longer 'needed' that investment because I was advised out of it. Sometimes too much research and too much informed opinion clouds one's judgement as much as emotionalism. Are you saying ATHM is a poor investment for the long term holder? That the supposed strife we are witness too, is evidence of a ship of fools? I read and post here for the same reason I research other sources, to be as informed on my investment as possible. Pure essentials?... I need air, water, some food and shelter. The rest are privileges and luxuries. Are you suggesting all financial investments are needless luxury?