SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: out_of_the_loop who wrote (2799)8/4/1999 1:13:00 AM
From: Druss  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 10293
 
Howard--I am truly confused on just what is going on with the study.
If further results are pending I would not give that particular article even a minute chance of publication in The New England Journal of Medicine. They have extremely demanding standards, only a small handful of journals carry their impact and none in the medical field. If they feel the results are still pending or the study incomplete, it has no chance of publication. They do like publishing ground breaking studies but the science has to be utterly solid.
I am curious as to what is going on.
All the Best
Druss



To: out_of_the_loop who wrote (2799)8/4/1999 1:21:00 AM
From: Phil(bullrider)  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10293
 
Howie,

I really don't have the time nor the inclination to look up the posts where you shills were discussing the NEJM report, but as I remember it, it was almost a surety. (According to you shills)

Now you appear to be backtracking.

As I stated, I don't have the time nor the inclination to even worry about it.

The truth will "come with the wash"

Have fun,
Phil


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News